WASHINGTON – The political conventions behind them and three debates ahead, Barack Obama and Mitt Romney now race against the calendar toward Nov. 6.
They have two months to deploy millions of dollars in ads, catch those voters who cast ballots weeks before Election Day, and log umpteen miles in a handful of crucial states – all while worrying what surprising news or candidate slip-up might set the whole enterprise on its ear.
Obama and Romney have huge staffs to help keep it all straight, of course. But you don’t. So here, for the rest of us, is a user’s guide to the last leg of the 2012 presidential campaign:
So far, polls show a tight race. But forget everything you’ve heard so far. In polling, only the newest numbers count – and the numbers capture a clearer picture beginning in September. It’s time to pay attention.
One obvious reason: Summer fun is over, and voters are finally following the campaigns. Polling from the Pew Research Center in 2008 showed the share following the campaign “very closely” just about doubled from 28 percent in late August to 57 percent just before Election Day. With the public more attuned to day-to-day developments, the potential for big shifts in the polls is amplified.
Another reason is less apparent: Many polls get more accurate in the final two months, as pollsters make refinements in their hunt for likely voters, the elusive target for election surveys.
Trying to reach voters – and no one else – means trying to pin down a group that exists only for one day (or a few, in the case of early voters) and whose demographic and geographic makeup can’t be known in advance. That’s because more people tell pollsters they plan to vote than actually do. In the final Associated Press-GfK poll before the 2008 election, 77 percent of adults said they were “completely certain to vote” or had already cast a ballot through early or absentee voting. Actual turnout among those age 18 and older was about 20 percentage points lower.
So pollsters use a series of questions to try to identify voters who are most likely to show up and weed out the rest. Every pollster’s definition of a likely voter is different; for some, they evolve over the course of the final two months.
Follow the money
Money is a huge factor in this election, and one of the hardest to track.
The presidential race is expected to cost $2 billion or more, between official campaign expenses and super PAC ad spending. It’s the first election since federal courts unraveled rules that had restricted how money could be spent in political races.
Outside groups can now raise and spend unlimited sums of cash with the help of millionaires and billionaires, who sometimes hide their identities as donors.
The result is a gusher of ads flowing through Monday Night Football and prime-time sitcoms until Election Day.
Something to watch for: In some states, the TV ads may suddenly vanish. That’s a sign that one of the campaigns has given up hope there and moved resources to a state that’s still in play.
And watch how this plays out: Romney’s side is far outspending Obama’s. Can the president narrow the gap?
Romney and his super PAC allies have spent more than $245 million on ads since the general election began in early April, according to advertising tracking data obtained by The Associated Press. That spending began outpacing the Democrats in mid-July, and the trend is expected to continue. By comparison, Obama and super PACs working in his favor have spent about $188 million since April.
The race is so tight that one misstep in the three presidential debates could greatly influence who wins.
The first debate, Oct. 3 in Denver, focuses on domestic policy.
Two weeks later, on Oct. 16, the Obama and Romney meet for a town hall-style session in Hempstead, N.Y.
On Oct. 22, two weeks before the election, foreign policy is the topic for the last presidential debate in Boca Raton, Fla., a swing state critical for the candidates.
And on the undercard, Vice President Joe Biden debates Rep. Paul Ryan on Oct. 11 in Danville, Ky.
With debates, it’s important to watch as well as listen. Despite hours of study and practice to get their best lines down pat, it’s sometimes actions, not words that prove memorable. Remember 1960, when people listening on the radio were certain Richard Nixon had won a debate, while those watching TV awarded it squarely to John F. Kennedy.
In 2000, Democrat Al Gore’s sighs lived on long after his words in his debates with Republican George W. Bush. Eight years earlier, Bush’s father, President George H.W. Bush, was caught looking at his watch during a town-hall debate with Democrat Bill Clinton and Ross Perot.
His response came as an audience member was talking about how much the deep recession had personally affected him. Bush, who lost that election, later said that he was thinking: “Only 10 more minutes of this crap.”
Lingo to know
Swing state: A state with a recent history of swinging its vote from one party to the other in presidential elections. Nevada, Colorado, Ohio, Florida, North Carolina, New Hampshire, Iowa and Virginia.
Battleground state: States where one or both sides are spending money on TV ads, staff members on the ground, candidate visits and so forth, either in hopes of winning or to force the other side to spend money playing defense. So far this year, that’s all the swing states, plus Wisconsin. Pennsylvania and Michigan also have seen action.
Super PAC: A new breed of political committee that can raise and spend limitless amounts of money but isn’t allowed to directly coordinate its activities with the Romney or Obama campaigns. The candidates can endorse these committees, however, and send former aides to run them.
Electoral College: Candidates win the presidency not by winning the popular vote, but by getting a majority of votes in the Electoral College. States are apportioned votes based on the number of senators and representatives they have in Congress, and all but two – Maine and Nebraska – award their electoral votes in winner-take-all style.
Jobs, money, numbers
This race is all about jobs and the economy, so government reports and stock market swings take on outsized importance.
The Labor Department reported sluggish job growth Friday, as employers added 96,000 jobs in August. The unemployment rate fell to 8.1 percent from 8.3 percent in July but that was only because more people gave up looking for work.
Romney immediately seized on the latest numbers as further evidence that Obama’s efforts to fix the economy have failed. The president said the numbers weren’t good enough but sought more time for the recovery.
The Labor Department will release two more monthly jobless reports, including one just four days before Election Day.
Also watch the Federal Reserve’s actions when it meets next week. It could dramatically boost the sluggish economy by announcing a third round of bond purchases designed to push long-term interest rates lower. Fed action would send the stock market soaring and boost many people’s retirement accounts, at least in the short term.
Congress returns for two weeks on Monday but will probably steer clear of the big election issues: taxes, deficits, health care, the economy and jobs. Its biggest task is passing a $524 billion spending bill to keep federal agencies operating through next March and prevent any possibility of a politically explosive government shutdown before the election.
Issues that might spill into the presidential race: disagreements over drought relief for livestock producers – an issue important to rural voters in swing state Iowa and elsewhere – and an increase in food stamp funding, which Republicans oppose.
Early voting power
Obama’s 2008 victory leaned heavily on early voting, which is now possible in 32 states and the District of Columbia.
His campaign mobilized thousands in the swing states of Florida, Colorado, North Carolina and Iowa – all states he won on his way to the presidency.
This time, Obama and Romney are both hoping to build up the early vote in the coming weeks. In early voting, people can cast early ballots, by mail or in person, without having to give a reason.
Early voting begins in Iowa on Sept. 27. Look for the candidates and the campaigns to focus heavily on states in the days leading up to their early votes.
An October surprise
OK, it could come in early November, too. But watch for unexpected news in the final weeks of the race that could shift things in one candidate’s favor. Past surprises have touched on major events – developments in the Vietnam War, the Iran hostage crisis, the Iran-Contra probe – and less weighty ones, such as George W. Bush’s two-decade-old drunken driving arrest.
This year, there’s speculation that Iran could pop up again, possibly in the form of an Israeli military strike against Iran’s suspected nuclear program. Iran insists it’s not developing a nuclear weapon; Israel believes that it is.
A unilateral Israeli attack on Iran could set off a chain reaction. Tehran’s counterattack could include strikes on U.S. personnel and bases in the region; the U.S. military might come to Israel’s aid; oil prices would skyrocket; spreading conflict could light the short fuse that is the Middle East.
All that would test Obama as commander in chief and roil the campaign.
But speculating on an October Surprise can be a fool’s game – that’s why it’s called a surprise. Wait and see.
Associated Press writers Martin Crutsinger, Andrew Taylor, Jennifer Agiesta, Tom Raum, Jack Gillum and Stephen Ohlemacher contributed to this report.