Log In


Reset Password
Opinion Editorial Cartoons Op-Ed Editorials Letters to the Editor

Clinton editorial was blatantly biased

Your editorial on the investigation of Hillary Clinton (Herald, July 5) is so blatantly biased as to be laughable.

“Who will become president is a political question to be decided by the American people,” the editorial states. That wasn’t the point of the FBI investigation. The point of the investigation was to find out if Hillary Clinton broke the law. She did. FBI Director James Comey presented five instances.

“I did not send or receive anything that was classified at the time,” Clinton said. That is a lie.“I have provided all my work-related emails,” she said. That is a lie.The Clinton campaign said that lawyers read through all the emails before deleting the rest. Another lie.“I opted, for convenience, to use my personal email account,” Clinton said. A lie.“No evidence” that server was ever hacked, she claimed. A lie. Top secret, special access, program classified material is never applied to a lunch date. She thought nothing of emailing this type of material on several occasions.

“The pronouncement came as no surprise,” you wrote. To any person paying attention to last Saturday’s news, that’s true. Recall: Bill Clinton just happened to meet with Attorney General Loretta Lynch on a tarmac in Arizona – the fix was in – and Lynch will be kept on at the Department of Justice with a possible promotion to the Supreme Court should Clinton be elected president!

Which is it? Is Hillary Clinton the biggest, stupidest buffoon to come down the pike? Or is she the biggest crook? It’s one or the other.

Either way, that should exclude her as president.

Ruth Ann Peterson

Albuquerque



Reader Comments