NEW YORK – The microbudget movie “Hundreds of Beavers” has turned into lo-fi legend. Mike Cheslik’s film, made for just $150,000 and self-distributed in theaters, has managed to gnaw its way into a movie culture largely dominated by big-budget sequels.
“Hundreds of Beavers” is a wordless black-and-white bonanza of slapstick antics about a stranded 19th century applejack salesman, played by his friend Ryland Tews, at war with a bevy of beavers, all of whom are played by actors in mascot costumes. It’s played in at least one theater a week since opening in January. On Dec. 5, it will play in more theaters than any point before.
It’s no overnight sensation. It’s been two years since Cheslik first premiered the film.
Like all great ideas, “Hundreds of Beavers” started at a bar. In October 2018, Cheslik and Tews were talking about how they could expand from their last film, “Lake Michigan Monster,” an antic, even lower budgeted B-movie about the hunt for a Great Lakes sea monster. It culminated in an elaborate animation sequence by Cheslik, a trial run for “Hundreds of Beavers.”
For their next movie, Cheslik imagined something reminiscent of childhood, with snowball fights and sled chases. Oh, and mascot costumes.
“Because mascots falling down is a universal language,” Tews says. “Everyone thinks that’s funny.”
“I love slapstick and I don’t know why it was a dormant genre for so long,” Cheslik says. “My guess is that when a country shifts from having more physical jobs to more of a service economy then the sense of humor becomes more verbal. The alligator in a pit is an HR referral instead of getting hurt at your job.”
They made “Hundreds of Beavers” over two winters during the pandemic, with pick-up shoots in between. It wasn’t particularly fun work – they were outside in negative-degree weather schlepping gear through the snow. But they were making exactly the movie they wanted, without compromise. And it didn’t resemble anything at the multiplex.
Cheslik and Tews are not proponents of high-priced gear. Making a movie, they say, doesn’t have to be an 8K camera and a rented location.
“We’re not camera nerds,” Cheslik says. “We just like images with strong shapes. We like to say: Shapes are free.”
In editing, Cheslik brought those shapes into greater relief. “Hundreds of Beavers” plays out as a surreal ballet of chiaroscuro pratfalls, with cartoonish figures set against a white winter expanse. The beavers, themselves, never totaled more than six, with Tews, Cheslik or friends variously acting inside the costumes. Almost every shot in the movie required at least some effects work.
“What you can do is go on your computer and take those six and duplicate them. I’m talkin’ 12 beavers. I’m talkin’, imagine a number, 18,” Cheslik says. “It’s technical stuff.”
Once it was finally done, they excitedly hit the festival circuit. After debuting “Hundreds of Beavers” at the Fantastic Fest, they played more festivals. And then some more. The crowd reaction was great and they won an audience award at the Fantasia Film Festival in 2023. But a decent offer never came. The old way of shopping a movie at a festival, they found, didn’t really exist anymore.
“It’s not enough just to make a movie,” Tews says. “That’s just the very beginning.”
Producer Kurt Ravenwood decided to explore a self-release. They sold streaming rights to Cineverse, the company that recently distributed the indie horror hit “Terrifier 3.” But they kept theatrical, merchandising and Blu-ray rights.
“It was a calculated risk to keep theatrical rights to ourselves,” Ravenwood says. “We had never, ever in our lives put on a theatrical run. But we knew that if we were able to get it booked, it would do well.”
They hired a distribution veteran to help book theaters and a publicist to spread the word. And they crossed their fingers.
They are already pondering their next movie; notecards hung on the wall behind Cheslik. For now, he’s only saying that it will, like “Hundreds of Beavers,” feature precise physical comedy.
“I don’t love when people say, ‘Our goal with this film just to get it out there. I don’t care if I make money,’” Cheslik says. “Are these films vanity projects for trust fund hobbyists, or is this an industry?”
