<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
    xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
    xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
    <title>Editorials</title>
    <category>Editorials</category>
    <link>https://www.durangoherald.com/section/editorials/feed/</link>
    <atom:link href="https://www.durangoherald.com/section/editorials/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <description>Stay informed with the latest breaking news, local stories, sports, business, weather, and community events from Durango, Southwest Colorado, and the Four Corners region.</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 17:53:18 -0600</lastBuildDate>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
        <link>https://www.durangoherald.com/articles/editorials/our-view-america-at-250/</link>
        <title>Our view: America at 250</title>
        <description>Today’s politics test the Founders’ design</description>
        <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 05:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">5CA1B32A-A959-43FB-9927-B7897F18C8C1</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Today’s politics test the Founders’ designAmericans can struggle to grasp the reasoning behind the writings of the Founding Fathers after the signing of the Declaration of Independence, which is celebrated this weekend. The debates about individual rights and the roles of state and national government in the Federalist Papers, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights can seem hazy in textbooks or lecture halls.No such trouble now, as President Donald Trump’s authoritarian decision-making, Congress’ silence and the mixed decisions by the Supreme Court are providing real-time examples of the nation’s extraordinary foundations. The actions and inactions should be fodder for debates in classrooms and on street corners, a reminder of the strengths of the American experiment that we believe the country will eventually return to.This week, the Supreme Court affirmed birthright citizenship, which Trump had hoped would end and reduce immigration numbers. Added to the Constitution originally to provide for those who had been enslaved and their offspring, it will continue. Days earlier, the court said yes to the president’s ability to remove independent federal agency members without cause if their participation wasn’t in line with the direction he was taking the country (the exception was members of the Federal Reserve, as the court clarified in a case involving Lisa Cook). Those members had been confirmed by the Senate and could only be removed for neglect of duty or malfeasance. The “unitary theory of the executive” in the Constitution was the court’s justification.Previous presidents have taken the country to war without much consultation with Congress, as the Constitution requires, but using the U.S. military to obliterate the occupants of a couple dozen fast boats at sea ostensibly transporting drugs without consultation or reporting is a new extreme. That’s murder, some critics say.Of greater significance is the president’s desire to replace states’ control of national elections with the federal government, despite no demonstrated need to change the current system. Gone would be mail-in balloting and the receipt of any ballots after Election Day, and the voter would have to appear on the national OK-to-vote list. The Supreme Court also ruled that states may count late-arriving postal ballots if they were postmarked by Election Day, rejecting the administration’s push to block the practice. It’s not hard to believe the president wants only his supporters to be able to vote.Then there’s the question of personal enrichment. This president’s overseas initiatives include components that enrich his family members. A share of mineral extraction, capital for a crypto company, the green light for a resort development – all in exchange for U.S. support and funding. Threatening to link weapons support for Ukraine to tarring a Joe Biden family member, for which Trump was impeached by the House, seems so long ago; we soon learned it was only the beginning.What do the founding documents say about preventing the president from enriching himself? Read the Domestic Emoluments Clause and the Foreign Emoluments Clause. Was it expected subsequent presidents would be as restrained as George Washington?And how can Congress, both houses, repeatedly acquiesce to the president’s lead in so many areas? He has refused to spend money that Congress has authorized and is spending money that it hasn’t. There has been little mention of the country’s debt, now approaching $40 trillion – about $3.2 trillion higher than when Trump took office – and funding is at the core of Congress’ responsibilities. One of the three branches of government is not exercising its constitutional role.Habeas corpus is a defendant’s right to hear from a judge what they are accused of. Seizing someone off the street because of their skin color or the language they’re speaking and then holding them without notice is illegal and not supposed to happen. The Constitution, again.The list could go on. Some of what is taking place now may endure in practice, but the country’s foundations of individual rights, an engaged Congress and an independent, honest judiciary remain strong enough to withstand it. What is taking place now is an example of what this country is not. Debate these issues to better understand what the Founding Fathers included in their work.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://www.durangoherald.com/articles/editorials/our-view-what-if/</link>
        <title>Our view: What if?</title>
        <description>Judith Reynolds marks 30 years of asking the question in ink</description>
        <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 05:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">541BB5FC-0709-413C-AE55-E67F7811F83A</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Judith Reynolds marks 30 years of asking the question in inkIn early May, on National Cartoonists Day (Herald, May 4), we wrote about the long American tradition of editorial cartooning – and about Judith Reynolds, who has carried that tradition locally for The Durango Herald since Morley Ballantine gave her the job in 1995. This weekend, that thread ties to a bigger one: the country’s 250th birthday, and the First Amendment protections that have made both possible.That tradition predates the amendment itself. Benjamin Franklin drew a snake in pieces in 1754, decades before the Bill of Rights existed. Ratified in 1791, the First Amendment now bars government from censoring or punishing citizens and the press for what they publish – opinions, criticisms, drawings included. It’s the same protection that lets Reynolds draw Mortie the cat eyeing City Council with open suspicion in 2026. Two hundred-fifty years on, the country is still arguing with itself in public, in print and online. That argument is the point.Reynolds – billed in the exhibit’s own materials as the oldest living political cartoonist in Colorado – marks 30 years on the job Friday with “30 Years of Durango Toons,” opening at the Durango Creative District gallery as part of First Fridays and, fittingly, Independence Day weekend.The show almost didn't happen this year. Early in 2026, Board Chair Richard Ballantine and Reynolds realized the actual 30th anniversary had quietly passed without notice. Something, they decided, should still be done. Kathryn Waggener and Jared Reed at the Durango Creative District moved quickly to make it happen, landing a July slot that doubles as a marker for the nation’s semiquincentennial.Reynolds, who left academia for journalism at 50, has said she wishes she’d made the leap sooner. Talking with us by phone this week, she put it simply: Journalism keeps you connected, current, always on a learning curve – “in the village in which we live” (no dangling prepositions for Reynolds). For a self-described lifelong learner, that’s the real payoff – not just the drawing, but the observation, the questioning, the staying in step with the place she calls home.What visitors will find isn’t a simple greatest-hits wall. Reynolds works by interrogating the news for alternatives, asking “what if?” before settling on a final take, then rendering it to meet deadline. The show draws a selection from her career body of roughly 850 cartoons, alongside caricatures, Colorado Press Association awards and, for the curious, pieces from her private archive of Trump-era drawings. Mortie, her mascot and alter ego, appears throughout – based on a real, long-departed pet, he still comments on the absurdities and affections of small-town life.Look, too, for the self-caricature Reynolds has said she plans to use for her own obituary someday – a piece she first described in a 2023 Herald Q&A marking her Extraordinary Woman Award from the Women’s Resource Center of La Plata County (Herald, April 4, 2023). It’s a fitting companion to a retrospective: the artist turning her pen on herself the way she’s turned it on the rest of us for 30 years.Reynolds isn’t done teaching, either. She’ll give an artist talk at 5:30 p.m. July 23 at the gallery – her first as a PowerPoint presentation – tracing the broader history of political cartooning, building on Life-Long Learning lectures she’s given through Fort Lewis College for more than two decades, with titles like “Iconoclasts and Outsiders,” “The Emperor’s New Clothes” and “Speak, Muse: The Seven Deadly Sins and the Art of Political Cartooning.”The exhibition, on display through July 31, is made possible by the Durango Creative District and the Center of Southwest Studies at FLC – where archivist Nik Kendziorski maintains the Judith Reynolds Durango Herald Collection. Both deserve thanks for preserving and presenting three decades of a small newspaper’s visual record of itself.We encourage readers to stop by the opening reception, 5 to 8 p.m. Friday at 1135 Main Ave., as part of First Fridays. It’s a chance to see three decades of this town’s arguments, anxieties and absurdities rendered in pencil, ink and watercolor – and to thank the woman who’s been drawing them.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://www.durangoherald.com/articles/editorials/our-view-when-a-family-becomes-a-legacy/</link>
        <title>Our view: When a family becomes a legacy</title>
        <description>A tribute to Pat, Katrina, Kurt and Rob Blair</description>
        <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 05:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">8986B6EF-1640-4142-971D-C3FD6ACCA443</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[A tribute to Pat, Katrina, Kurt and Rob BlairDeath comes for us all. It is as natural as birth, as certain as seasons turning. And yet most of us spend our lives looking away from it – changing the subject and moving on to something more comfortable.The Blair family never looked away from anything.Rob Blair, the Fort Lewis College geologist who taught students to read mountains the way others read books, died Nordic skiing in February 2015 at 71 – moving through the landscape he loved to the end. More than a professor, Rob was a force of nature – arms gesturing wildly, his enthusiasm for the San Juans infectious and unbounded. He helped initiate the founding of the Mountain Studies Institute, setting a vision for science-grounded stewardship of this landscape that outlived him and continues today.His wife Pat co-founded the Durango Natural Foods Co-op in the mid-1970s, pioneering healthy food choices in Durango for half a century, and was honored in September 2024 at the co-op’s 50th anniversary. She died this week.Their son Kurt earned his International Federation of Mountain Guides certification – held by fewer than 200 people in America – and died Dec. 1, 2024 at age 56, ascending Mount Cook in New Zealand, doing what he loved in one of his favorite places.Their daughter Katrina founded Turtle Lake Refuge in 1998, launched Durango's annual Dandelion Festival, authored Local Wild Life and The Wild Wisdom of Weeds, hiked to Telluride every August subsisting entirely on foraged food, and quietly changed how thousands of people understood the land beneath their feet. She died June 5 after living with cancer. She, too, was 56.In the space of less than two years, Durango has lost an entire family. The Mountain Studies Institute said what many are feeling: “MSI, like the greater Durango community, is struggling with the loss of a family that has been a cornerstone of our community for longer than many of us can remember.”Rob opened the wild. Pat opened the doors to health. Katrina fed the community from the wild lands we all love, and Kurt guided others to the summits. The Blairs built something rare: a family whose lives reinforced one another, each extending the others’ reach into the world. And they all shared something unmistakable – a light, a twinkle, an enthusiasm for living that made you want to follow wherever they led.In her final days, a friend reports, Katrina described a dream in which she saw her brother and father – arms outstretched. Whatever one believes about what follows this life, the image is beautiful: a family reunited in the mountains they never stopped climbing.Death, as Katrina understood it, is not an ending but a transformation. She arranged for a green burial on the land she loved, her body returned to the earth to become fertile soil for new life. Thirteen seeds were planted with her. Friends sang. Tears mixed with laughter. It was exactly what she wanted – a celebration, not a departure.Most of us are not so wise about death. But there is a quiet movement to change that. The Durango Death Cafe meets the fourth Monday of every month, 4 to 5:30 p.m., at the Durango Public Library – a gathering where people come to talk openly about the one experience we will all share. It is simply honest conversation about what it means to live a finite life well. Herald columnist Martha McClellan explores these questions regularly in her Authentic Aging column, a thoughtful and wide-ranging companion for navigating the terrain of growing old and letting go. For those who are grieving, the Grief Center of Southwest Colorado provides bereavement services for adults, teens, children and families in the Durango area.The Blairs lived finite lives extraordinarily well. That abundance – of knowledge, passion and community – is now ours to steward: read Katrina’s books, dine at Turtle Lake Refuge, support Mountain Studies Institute, honor Kurt through the Pursuit of Passions Award, shop the co-op Pat built, and go outside and dig your toes into the dandelions at your feet.They are dancing in the mountains now, together, arms wide open. It is what they would have wanted. Let us make something extraordinary of the time we have left.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://www.durangoherald.com/articles/editorials/our-view-your-primary-election-primer/</link>
        <title>Our view: Your primary election primer</title>
        <description>Ballots are due June 30, and the decisions voters make in the primary will shape the choices available in November. Primary elections determine who appears on the general election ballot, and in Colorado, unaffiliated voters play an increasingly influential role...</description>
        <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 05:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">E01A24EA-BA82-42F6-823A-E87585B433E2</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Ballots are due June 30, and the decisions voters make in the primary will shape the choices available in November.Primary elections determine who appears on the general election ballot, and in Colorado, unaffiliated voters play an increasingly influential role in those decisions. More than half of Colorado voters are registered unaffiliated and may participate in either party’s primary.Yet participation remains low. In 2024, only about 26% of Colorado voters participated in the primary election, including 27.8% in La Plata County.Over the past several weeks, the Herald Editorial Board interviewed candidates, published guest columns and developed recommendations based on candidates’ qualifications, experience and approaches to governing. Here is a summary of those recommendations.United States SenateDemocratic Primary: John Hickenlooper over Julie Gonzales.Gonzales has built an impressive legislative record and represents a rising generation of Colorado leadership. Hickenlooper, however, brings experience as a former Denver mayor, governor and U.S. senator. His record on public lands, water policy, tribal partnerships and bipartisan problem-solving made him the stronger choice.Republican Primary: Mark Baisley is unopposed.Representative to the 120th U.S. Congress – District 3Democratic Primary: Dwayne Romero over Alex Kelloff.Both candidates focused on issues important to rural Colorado, including affordability, healthcare, water and economic development. Romero’s experience in state government, local elected office, business and military service gives him a stronger foundation for representing the diverse needs of rural Colorado and serving effectively in Congress.Republican Primary: Jeff Hurd over Ron Hanks.While we encouraged Hurd to continue demonstrating independence on issues such as public lands and voter participation, we concluded he offers a broader and more inclusive vision than Hanks, whose campaign has been closely aligned with efforts to restrict participation by unaffiliated voters in Colorado's primary elections.GovernorDemocratic Primary: Phil Weiser over Michael Bennet.Both candidates are accomplished public servants. Bennet’s record in the U.S. Senate is substantial, but Weiser’s eight years as attorney general, relationships across all 64 counties and deep familiarity with Colorado government gave him the edge.Republican Primary: Barbara Kirkmeyer over Scott Bottoms and Victor Marx.Kirkmeyer distinguished herself through decades of governing experience, including more than 20 years as a Weld County commissioner and service in the state Senate. While Bottoms and Marx offered sharply different visions, Kirkmeyer demonstrated the strongest record of public administration, bipartisan problem-solving and practical governance. As we noted, running government is different from campaigning against it.Secretary of StateDemocratic Primary: Jessie Danielson over Amanda Gonzalez.Both candidates are well qualified and have strong records defending Colorado’s election system. Danielson’s rural roots, legislative experience and leadership on voting access issues gave her a slight advantage.Republican Primary: James Wiley is unopposed.Attorney GeneralDemocratic Primary: Michael Dougherty over Jena Griswold, David Seligman and Hetal Doshi.Dougherty’s nearly three decades as a prosecutor, service as deputy attorney general and leadership in some of Colorado’s most significant criminal cases make him uniquely qualified for the state’s top legal position.Republican Primary: Michael Allen over David Wilson.Both bring military and legal experience, but Allen’s leadership as district attorney for El Paso and Teller counties and his record managing major criminal prosecutions made him the stronger choice.Primary elections offer voters something increasingly rare in modern politics: an opportunity to compare candidates who often share broad values but differ significantly in experience, priorities and governing philosophies.The choices made on June 30 will shape Colorado’s choices in November. Whether you are a Democrat, Republican or one of the many unaffiliated voters who now help decide primary outcomes, the most important step is simple: participate.The future of Colorado is not shaped only in November. It is being shaped right now.Editor’s note: Herald editorials reflect the views of the Editorial Board, independent of news reporting. Opinion content – including editorials, columns and letters to the editor – is intended to encourage thoughtful discussion of public issues and candidates. While opinions may differ, the Herald strives to ensure that all content is grounded in facts, context and informed analysis.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://www.durangoherald.com/articles/editorials/our-view-the-art-of-community/</link>
        <title>Our view: The art of community</title>
        <description>On June 4 in Trinidad, Gov. Jared Polis recognized KSUT Four Corners Public Radio Executive Director Tami Graham with a Governor’s Creative Leadership Award, honoring individuals who use the arts to create meaningful change in their communities. Over a 42-year...</description>
        <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 05:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">93EA54A1-67FA-43DB-9FD4-2650D1DD9B0C</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[On June 4 in Trinidad, Gov. Jared Polis recognized KSUT Four Corners Public Radio Executive Director Tami Graham with a Governor's Creative Leadership Award, honoring individuals who use the arts to create meaningful change in their communities.Over a 42-year career, Graham, a longtime Mancos resident, has helped shape Southwest Colorado’s cultural landscape, championing public media, local storytelling and community spaces for artists. Among her many contributions, she helped transform the historic Mancos Times-Tribune building from a shuttered eyesore into a thriving center for artists and community life. She was also among the founders of the Mancos Creative District, an organization that continues to strengthen the town’s cultural and economic vitality.Canadian painter Ken Danby once observed, “In scarcity, art is a necessity.”Few communities understand that better than Mancos.Founded in 2015, the Mancos Creative District has become a model for how arts, culture and entrepreneurship can strengthen community identity and support rural economic development. Its guiding philosophy is simple: creativity is good business, creativity is connection and creativity is community identity.That vision will be on display Saturday, June 20, at BurroFest, one of Southwest Colorado’s most original celebrations. More burros than ever will join artists, musicians, makers, food vendors and families for a uniquely Mancos event blending creativity, history and rural heritage.The festival also highlights the partnerships that make communities stronger. The Montezuma Heritage Museum, Mancos Conservation District and Mesa Verde Association will join others in sharing the stories, history and landscapes that define Montezuma County.New features include the Beverage Pasture, offering wine, beer, cider, lawn games and a paint-and-sip experience. The festival will also debut the Book Burro, a traveling library created by Durango-based Maria’s Literary Foundation with the help of students, artists and community volunteers.From historic preservation and public art to festivals and community gathering spaces, these efforts do more than entertain. They create connections, attract visitors and strengthen the fabric of community life.As the old proverb reminds us, a society grows great when its citizens plant trees in whose shade they will never sit. Through the arts, Mancos continues cultivating a community that is creative, connected and distinctly its own.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://www.durangoherald.com/articles/editorials/our-view-making-places-matter/</link>
        <title>Our view: Making places matter</title>
        <description>On June 4 in Trinidad, Gov. Jared Polis recognized KSUT Four Corners Public Radio Executive Director Tami Graham with a Governor’s Creative Leadership Award, honoring individuals who use the arts to create meaningful change in their communities. Over a 42-year...</description>
        <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 05:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">F5B98EE4-A2B2-4EA8-AFA7-D7EC73406C6C</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[On June 4 in Trinidad, Gov. Jared Polis recognized KSUT Four Corners Public Radio Executive Director Tami Graham with a Governor's Creative Leadership Award, honoring individuals who use the arts to create meaningful change in their communities.Over a 42-year career, Graham has helped shape Southwest Colorado's cultural landscape. She brought emerging musicians to Durango long before they became household names, helped restore the historic Mancos Times-Tribune building into a thriving arts space, and has championed public media, local storytelling and Indigenous voices. Through KSUT, she continues strengthening the connections that bind communities across the Four Corners.Just weeks earlier, Silverton Creative District Executive Director Lisa Branner received the Colorado Business Committee for the Arts' Next Wave Leadership Award. Her work has connected artists with businesses, schools, nonprofits and local government while growing events that draw visitors, support local commerce and strengthen Silverton's creative economy.Both honors are well deserved. They also shine a light on the artists, entrepreneurs, volunteers, nonprofit leaders and community builders whose work often happens quietly, but whose influence can be seen across Southwest Colorado.In rural communities, where resources are often limited, the arts become even more vital. Canadian painter Ken Danby once observed, “In scarcity, art is a necessity.”Southwest Colorado understands that. Here, the arts do more than entertain; they create gathering places, strengthen local economies and tell community stories.From 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. Saturday, June 20, Mancos will host BurroFest, one of the region's most original celebrations. Artists, burros, musicians, vendors and families will gather for an event that could only happen here. Twelve artists will create original works inspired by live burro models, blending creativity, history and rural heritage into something distinctly Southwest Colorado.This year's festival also marks the debut of the Book Burro, a vintage Airstream transformed into a traveling library by Maria's Literary Foundation. Built by Animas High School students, local artist Jenn Rawling and community volunteers, it will bring free books and literary programming to communities throughout the Four Corners.Tuesday's Local First Be Local Bash celebrated the people, partnerships and purpose behind La Plata County's independent business community. Local business owners don't simply compete; they encourage one another, share ideas and help make dreams come true.Increasingly, stewards of some of Durango's hallmark businesses are passing the torch to a new generation of homegrown entrepreneurs. Maria's Bookshop, which celebrated its 40th anniversary last year, is now led by Evan Schertz, son of longtime owners Peter Schertz and Andrea Avantaggio. Claire and Colin Carver carry forward the legacy of Carver Brewing Co., Colorado's second-oldest brewpub and the first on the Western Slope. Earlier this year, Durango native, Animas High School graduate and former Durango Devo rider Elliott Saslow purchased Mountain Bike Specialists, continuing the legacy of a 58-year-old Durango institution built by Ed and Patti Zink.Collectively, their efforts are behind the murals that brighten downtown alleys, the public art that transforms gathering spaces, the festivals that draw visitors and strengthen local economies, and the institutions that endure across generations – the things that give a community its character.Which brings us to Buckley Park.Buckley is more than a park. It is Durango's Central Park – a civic commons where community life unfolds through concerts, festivals, demonstrations, winter sledding and countless everyday moments of connection.During a recent City Council discussion about parking for the future Civic Campus, Councilor Gilda Yazzie floated the possibility of taking land from Buckley Park for parking. The suggestion was met with roughly 10 seconds of silence from her fellow councilors.Sometimes silence says enough.Joni Mitchell warned about paving paradise and putting up a parking lot.Durango purchased Buckley Park to preserve it as a park. The city should honor that commitment and consider permanently protecting the park's future, including its sledding hill, heritage trees and large open lawn.Residents can help shape that future at the city's Buckley Park Master Plan workshop from 4 to 6 p.m. Monday, June 15, at Buckley Park.Show up. Share your ideas.The people who make places matter are ultimately stewards. As the old proverb dictates, a society grows great when its citizens plant trees in whose shade they will never sit.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://www.durangoherald.com/articles/editorials/our-view-the-power-of-us/</link>
        <title>Our view: The Power of “Us”</title>
        <description>Colorado&apos;s largest political party isn&apos;t a party at all</description>
        <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 05:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">6C84FB3D-FCF1-4FC4-ABA4-D09D951C6B5D</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Colorado's largest political party isn't a party at allBallots were mailed June 8 for Colorado's June 30 primary election. For many voters, November remains the focus. The winners of this month's contests will move on, and by mid-October general election ballots will begin arriving in mailboxes across Colorado.That perspective misses what primary elections offer.It is in the primaries that Coloradans get their first sustained look at the candidates political parties are putting forward for November. Through petition drives, state assemblies or a combination of both, candidates earn a place on the ballot. They spend months traveling the state, attending forums, answering questions and refining their proposals in response to voters.Some candidates won't survive June 30.Some of their ideas will.That is one of the overlooked strengths of the primary process.Colorado's largest political party isn't a party at all. More than half the state's voters are registered as unaffiliated. Democrats and Republicans still dominate much of the political conversation, but it is increasingly unaffiliated voters – the “Us” in Colorado politics – who decide which candidates and ideas advance.That influence is especially notable this year. Republicans have elected only one governor in the last half-century and have not held the office since Bill Owens left in 2007. Political observers believe the winner of the Democratic primary for governor will enter November as the favorite to become Colorado's next governor. Whether that proves correct is ultimately up to voters. What is beyond dispute is that decisions made in June will shape the choices available in November.Primary elections provide something voters rarely receive in the general election: the opportunity to compare candidates who may share broad values but differ significantly in experience, priorities and governing philosophies.Colorado's closely watched Democratic primary for governor offers a useful example. In recent interviews with the Herald Editorial Board, Attorney General Phil Weiser and U.S. Sen. Michael Bennet discussed not only where they differ, but also where their priorities overlap. Asked what they would continue from the Polis administration, both candidates spoke favorably of Colorado's investments in early childhood education, including universal preschool and full-day kindergarten. Asked about ideas from their opponent's campaign worth considering, common ground emerged around housing affordability and concerns about the effects of cellphones and social media on young people. Bennet has advocated for stronger statewide action, while Weiser has generally preferred local solutions. Those exchanges echoed a broader debate at the Capitol, where Gov. Jared Polis vetoed bipartisan legislation inspired by the Evergreen High School shooting that would have required social media companies to report certain threats to law enforcement and respond to search warrants within 24 hours, citing First and Fourth Amendment concerns.Candidates may not survive a primary. Their ideas often do. Housing, early childhood education, workforce development and social media policy will remain part of Colorado's public debate regardless of who advances to November.Participation remains a challenge. In Colorado's 2022 primary election, turnout reached 31.96% of active voters statewide. By 2024, that figure had fallen to roughly 26%. La Plata County posted 42.26% turnout in 2022 but fell to 27.8% in 2024. More than seven out of 10 active voters sat out the election that helped determine who would appear on the November ballot.Those numbers are difficult to reconcile with the influence primary elections now carry.Colorado's primary system gives unaffiliated voters a seat at the table. The question is whether enough of us choose to sit at it.The power of “Us” is found in participation.Ballots are arriving in mailboxes. Colorado can do better than a quarter of voters showing up to help shape the future of the state.June 30 is not a prelude to democracy.It is democracy.Editor’s note: Herald editorials reflect the views of the Editorial Board, independent of news reporting. Opinion content – including editorials, columns and letters to the editor – is intended to encourage thoughtful discussion of public issues and candidates. While opinions may differ, the Herald strives to ensure that all content is grounded in facts, context and informed analysis.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://www.durangoherald.com/articles/editorials/our-view-primary-choices-attorney-general-and-secretary-of-state/</link>
        <title>Our view: Primary choices – attorney general and secretary of state</title>
        <description>Attorney General – Democratic Party Primary Jena Griswold is an attorney serving her second term as Colorado secretary of state after winning election in 2018. As secretary of state, she expanded voter access, increased ballot drop boxes, implemented automatic voter...</description>
        <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 05:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">82F59EF2-104A-4B2B-A424-E7A685E71CDC</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Attorney General – Democratic Party PrimaryJena Griswold is an attorney serving her second term as Colorado secretary of state after winning election in 2018. As secretary of state, she expanded voter access, increased ballot drop boxes, implemented automatic voter registration, and championed laws protecting election workers and voting equipment. Her campaign centers on defending democracy, protecting civil rights and protecting Colorado from actions by the Trump administration.David Seligman is a consumer-rights, labor-rights and antitrust attorney who serves as executive director of Towards Justice. A Harvard Law School graduate, he has built his campaign around workers’ rights, consumer protection and corporate accountability.Hetal Doshi is a former federal prosecutor and deputy assistant attorney general at the U.S. Department of Justice. She helped lead antitrust cases against Google, Apple and Ticketmaster and has emphasized consumer protection and voting rights.Michael Dougherty has spent nearly three decades as a prosecutor and serves as Boulder County district attorney. He previously served as Colorado’s deputy attorney general, supervising units responsible for public corruption, election-related crimes, environmental crimes and financial fraud.Dougherty led the prosecution of the King Soopers mass shooter and played a pivotal role in securing justice in the Mark Redwine murder case, helping secure Redwine’s conviction more than a decade after his 13-year-old son, Dylan, disappeared from Vallecito. He has earned endorsements from Democratic and Republican prosecutors, sheriffs and law-enforcement leaders across Colorado.All four Democrats bring strengths to the race. But the attorney general’s office demands courtroom experience, management ability and legal judgment. Dougherty’s nearly 30 years as a prosecutor, service as deputy attorney general and record in some of Colorado’s most significant criminal cases make him uniquely qualified for the job. Advancing Dougherty to November would give Democrats their strongest candidate and Colorado a proven legal leader.Attorney General – Republican Party PrimaryMichael Allen is the district attorney for El Paso and Teller counties, where he is serving a second term. A Navy veteran, Allen points to his role in creating an organized crime unit and the state’s first vehicle theft task force. He is best known for prosecuting the Club Q mass shooting case. Allen argues that local governments should not dictate national energy policy and has criticized Boulder County’s climate-related lawsuit against energy companies.David Wilson spent 20 years in the U.S. Army’s Judge Advocate General’s Corps as both a prosecutor and defense attorney. He later advised the National Security Agency and now consults on cybersecurity and fraud issues. Wilson recently participated in efforts to exclude unaffiliated voters from Colorado primaries and has been a vocal supporter of former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters, saying, “What happened to Tina Peters is disgusting.” He has criticized Attorney General Phil Weiser’s lawsuits against the Trump administration, and faulted Democrats for funding medical care for undocumented immigrants and pursuing policies he believes threaten TABOR.Both candidates bring legal credentials and military service to the race. Allen, however, has demonstrated success leading a major prosecutorial office and handling some of Colorado’s most consequential criminal cases. Republicans would be better served advancing Allen.Secretary of State – Democratic Party PrimaryAmanda Gonzalez is Jefferson County’s clerk and recorder, overseeing elections for more than half a million residents. She previously served as executive director of Colorado Common Cause.Jessie Danielson served two terms in the Colorado House and is completing her second term in the Senate. Raised on a Weld County farm, she has been a leading voice in expanding voting access and strengthening Colorado’s election system.Both candidates have defended Colorado’s election process, opposed federal efforts to obtain confidential voter information and advocated for broad voter access, including for eligible voters held in county jails. Either would serve the state well at a time when election administration faces constant attacks. Danielson earns the nod because of her rural roots, record of reelection and active role in successful legislative efforts to make voting in Colorado more accessible.Her endorsements from the Southern Ute Indian Tribe, La Plata County Clerk Tiffany Lee and county clerks from both parties underscore her credibility across political and geographic lines. Advancing Danielson to November would be the better choice.RepublicanJames Wiley is unopposed.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://www.durangoherald.com/articles/editorials/primary-choices-an-early-look/</link>
        <title>Primary choices: an early look</title>
        <description>Colorado voters approved open primaries in 2016 when Proposition 108 passed, allowing unaffiliated voters to participate in either major party’s primary. Last month, a Denver judge rejected an effort by Republican candidates, including CD3 challenger Ron Hanks, to block unaffiliated...</description>
        <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 05:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">C3409FCD-1E47-4FA8-9369-A7A2378F8F18</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Colorado voters approved open primaries in 2016 when Proposition 108 passed, allowing unaffiliated voters to participate in either major party's primary. Last month, a Denver judge rejected an effort by Republican candidates, including CD3 challenger Ron Hanks, to block unaffiliated voters from voting in this year's primary – an effort opposed by incumbent Rep. Jeff Hurd.The ruling preserves access for Colorado's largest voting bloc. Of the state's nearly 4 million registered voters, 53% are unaffiliated, compared with 25% Democrats and 22% Republicans. Excluding them from the primary process would diminish participation by more than half Colorado's electorate.Ballots will be mailed June 8 for the June 30 primary election.U.S. Senate – Democratic Party PrimaryJulie Gonzales was elected to the state Senate in 2018, returned in 2022, and served as majority whip. She has chaired the judiciary committee, been vice chair of local government and housing, and serves on appropriations.A Yale graduate with Colorado roots, Gonzales, 43, grew up partly in Arizona on her family's ranch.She has worked to defend immigrant protections and abortion rights and to end the death penalty. She faults incumbent Sen. John Hickenlooper for insufficient advocacy on public lands and climate, and for accepting corporate campaign funding.Hickenlooper has described himself as a failed geologist who went on to cofound one of Denver's first brewpubs before serving as Denver mayor (2003–2011) and Colorado governor (2011–2019). He helped create the state's water plan, advocated for Ute Mountain Ute economic, water and broadband priorities, and worked on gun safety legislation.Hickenlooper is more inclined to work thoughtfully behind the scenes than to raise his voice from the Senate lectern.While Julie Gonzales has built a formidable record and clearly knows Coloradans' needs, advancing incumbent John Hickenlooper to November would be best for the state. Colorado hasn't heard the last of her – she has the talent and experience to one day serve in higher office.Republicans will advance state Sen. Mark Baisley to November without a contested primary.Congressional District 3 – Democratic Party PrimaryAlex Kelloff is a business owner with more than three decades of experience in telecommunications and infrastructure development. He spent much of the past year traveling the district, emphasizing affordability, rural economic development, health care access and public lands. Kelloff has highlighted his family's roots in the San Luis Valley.Dwayne Romero is a West Point graduate, Army Ranger and Bronze Star recipient who served as Colorado's economic development director under then-Gov. John Hickenlooper and in several local elected roles. Romero has centered his campaign on affordability, public lands, water, health care and support for rural communities.Both candidates have focused on issues that matter to Western and Southern Colorado. Kelloff's background in infrastructure and economic development offers a thoughtful perspective on the district's challenges. Romero, however, brings a broader record of public service and leadership. His experience in state government, local elected office and business gives him a deeper understanding of rural Colorado and governing. Advancing Romero to November would give Democrats their strongest candidate in the general election.Congressional District 3 – Republican Party PrimaryRon Hanks is a former state representative, military veteran and self-described America First conservative. He has aligned himself closely with President Donald Trump and criticized Hurd for breaking with the Republican president on tariffs, public lands and a vote against censuring Rep. Ilhan Omar.Hurd, a Grand Junction attorney elected in 2024, has demonstrated a willingness to depart from party orthodoxy when he believes it is warranted. He also opposed efforts to exclude unaffiliated voters from the primary process, drawing criticism from the Republican Party's right flank.While Hurd should continue demonstrating that independence – particularly by supporting Sen. Michael Bennet's Public Lands Integrity Act and standing firm against efforts to sell public lands – advancing him to November is the better choice. Hanks' challenge is rooted in a brand of politics that seeks to narrow participation rather than broaden it, a direction Colorado voters rejected when they approved open primaries nearly a decade ago.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://www.durangoherald.com/articles/editorials/our-view-lpea-election-2/</link>
        <title>Our View: LPEA election</title>
        <description>Close races call for humility – and careful stewardship</description>
        <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 05:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">0FC4C32B-342C-4E68-8F2F-EF98B171D7BC</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Close races call for humility – and careful stewardshipCongratulations are in order to everyone who ran for the La Plata Electric Association board this year. Offering oneself up for public scrutiny, criticism and a vote is no small thing. Every candidate who stepped forward contributed to the health of the cooperative and the democratic process that governs it.The election results delivered two very different messages.In District 1 (Archuleta County), incumbent Nicole Pitcher defeated James Lane by just 58 votes, 1,175 to 1,117. In District 4 (North & East La Plata County), John Purser defeated incumbent David Luschen by only 68 votes. Those narrow outcomes reflect a membership still divided over affordability, governance and LPEA’s future after leaving Tri-State.District 3 (City of Durango) was different. Jennifer Jenkins defeated Jodi Zuber 1,479 to 677 – more than doubling her opponent’s vote total. Members clearly responded to Jenkins’ renewable-energy background and her message that LPEA must successfully manage its own grid while improving communication with members.For the winners in the close races, the takeaway should be straightforward: represent broadly. Reaching a little further, listening a little harder and recognize that some districts preferred another candidate. Cooperative boards function best when directors remember they represent the full membership, not just the members that elected them.The election also highlighted an awkward dynamic. Two sitting board members – including Ted Compton (Herald, May 15), board vice president, and Joe Lewandowski (Herald, May 8) – publicly endorsed preferred candidates and submitted letters to the editor supporting them. The instinct is understandable. Sitting directors naturally want colleagues with whom they believe they can work effectively over the next three years and pursue shared goals.Still, publicly campaigning for future colleagues can create tension when everyone must return to the same board room and govern together. After several close races, directors now must work to build trust with one another – and with members who supported opposing candidates.As new members prepare to take their seats, appreciation also is due to outgoing directors Rachel Landis, David Luschen and John Lee for their service and willingness to lead during one of the most consequential periods in LPEA’s history.Purser’s victory deserves attention beyond the margin itself. This was his fourth attempt to win a seat on the board. That persistence likely resonated with voters after years of debate surrounding the Tri-State withdrawal and its financial implications.Purser has frequently criticized LPEA leadership and finances from the outside. In a recent post following the May Finance and Audit Committee meeting, he highlighted interest-on-long-term-debt figures tied to LPEA’s roughly $163 million borrowing associated with its post–Tri-State transition. The figures showed year-to-date costs through April at roughly $2.5 million compared with a forecast of about $1.6 million – a 57% increase. April alone came in at just over $1 million against a forecast of roughly $726,000, about 38% higher than projected. His criticism centered on budgeting assumptions and whether LPEA underestimated borrowing costs tied to the transition.Those are fair questions for a board member to ask, particularly at a cooperative managing major power-supply and infrastructure decisions. Purser and incoming board member Greg Barber both bring financial backgrounds that could benefit the cooperative in the years ahead.Power-purchase negotiations and supplier contracts often involve sensitive pricing and strategic information that cannot be publicly disclosed without undermining LPEA’s bargaining position or its ability to maintain productive business relationships. Protecting LPEA’s bargaining position is part of protecting member interests.New board members should ask difficult questions, stay curious and challenge assumptions. They also should recognize that governance differs from campaigning. Listening carefully, observing operations and understanding the limits of public disclosure are part of responsible oversight.The public should remain engaged as that work begins. LPEA’s next board meeting is scheduled for 9 a.m. June 17 at LPEA headquarters in Durango, with options to attend in person or virtually.Members also should take advantage of practical opportunities to reduce energy costs. 4CORE and LPEA are hosting free workshops in Pagosa Springs on June 9, Durango on June 10, and Towaoc on June 11, focused on home-efficiency upgrades, heat pumps, and rebate programs that can provide qualifying households up to $14,000 in assistance.The election is over. The harder work of governing together starts now.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://www.durangoherald.com/articles/editorials/our-view-glenwood-canyon/</link>
        <title>Our view: Glenwood Canyon</title>
        <description>Frozen Colorado River funding begins to thaw</description>
        <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 05:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">AA6790EC-CDB9-42BC-9DED-161970F33459</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Frozen Colorado River funding begins to thawThe Department of the Interior last week reversed its earlier decision to not participate in the purchase of senior nonconsumptive water rights on the Colorado River through Glenwood Canyon, helping ensure that the water will continue serving Western Slope agricultural, recreational and environmental interests rather than potentially becoming available for consumptive diversion to the Front Range.The Shoshone hydroelectric power plant was constructed more than 110 years ago and generates about 15 megawatts of power, equal to about 15,000 customers. The concern has long been that the aging plant, owned by Xcel Energy, could eventually face maintenance or operational challenges significant enough to threaten continued operation, potentially changing the status of its historic water right and opening the door to future consumptive use elsewhere in Colorado.Contributions toward the $99 million purchase price came in relatively small but important amounts from dozens of Western Slope water districts, local governments and conservation interests that understand the importance of preserving Shoshone flows. Colorado’s water board committed $20 million. What remained uncertain was the $40 million promised during the Biden administration through federal Colorado River drought-response funding.That federal commitment was effectively shut off after Donald Trump took office and froze or reevaluated portions of Inflation Reduction Act spending tied to Colorado River resiliency projects. Colorado’s entire congressional delegation – Democrats and Republicans alike – later urged the administration to release roughly $140 million in stalled Colorado River drought-response funding affecting projects across the Western Slope and Southwest Colorado. (Herald, Aug. 5, 2025).Then, in mid-May, some of the gates finally began to reopen. According to The Colorado Sun, federal officials released $47 million for previously frozen Colorado water projects, including drought mitigation work in Southwest Colorado; ecosystem and watershed improvements on the Southern Ute Reservation; wetland and flood plain restoration projects in western Colorado; and habitat work in the Gunnison Basin. About a week after Gov. Jared Polis announced clemency for Tina Peters on May 15, the Department of the Interior also released the long-awaited $40 million award for the Shoshone Water Rights Preservation Project.Whether the renewed movement of federal water funding was purely administrative, the result of bipartisan congressional pressure, or influenced by broader political dynamics may never be fully known. But after more than a year of uncertainty, Washington has finally begun releasing some of the long-promised Colorado River funding.Congressman Jeff Hurd, whose district includes this stretch of river geography, deserves significant credit for persistently pressing the issue with the administration. But the eventual funding release also reflected unusually broad bipartisan support. Colorado’s congressional delegation – including Republican Reps. Lauren Boebert, Jeff Crank and Gabe Evans alongside Democratic Sens. Michael Bennet and John Hickenlooper and Reps. Joe Neguse, Jason Crow, Diana DeGette, Brittany Pettersen and others – publicly urged federal agencies to move the stalled projects forward. The Colorado River District likewise credited local governments, ditch companies, conservation groups and water providers across the Western Slope for sustaining the effort.Although about $97 million of the $99 million has now been committed, the purchase still requires final approval from the Colorado Public Utilities Commission as well as completion of ongoing proceedings in Colorado water court.The urgency is real. Colorado River groups across the basin recently warned Congress that 2026 is shaping up as one of the most difficult water years in generations, with historically poor snowpack, drought across most of the watershed and projections of extremely low inflows into Lake Powell. In that context, preserving dependable West Slope flows through Glenwood Canyon is more than symbolic – it is part of a much broader fight over the future reliability of the Colorado River system itself.Protecting flows through Glenwood Canyon will not solve the Colorado River’s long-term shortages, but preserving the Shoshone right helps sustain rafting, fishing, agriculture, ecosystems and the broader West Slope economy that depends on healthy river flows.Here’s hoping there’s not another abrupt change in direction from Washington and that protection of the Shoshone flows can finally be made permanent. The Colorado River – and the communities that rely on it – deserve that certainty.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://www.durangoherald.com/articles/editorials/our-view-75th-general-assembly/</link>
        <title>Our view: 75th General Assembly</title>
        <description>A legislative session of hard choices – and revealing priorities</description>
        <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 05:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">82508E90-2560-4CAC-A0CC-76FEC1D9EDD4</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[A legislative session of hard choices – and revealing prioritiesOne week after Colorado lawmakers adjourned the 2026 session, the clearest takeaway is not simply what lawmakers passed but what they chose to prioritize in a year defined by scarcity.Legislators spent 120 days navigating a budget shortfall estimated at $1.2 billion to $1.5 billion, driven by Medicaid costs, slowing revenue growth and federal uncertainty. Democrats blamed cuts and chaos in Washington. Republicans blamed years of overspending and unchecked program growth. Both sides agreed on one thing: There was not enough money.The cuts were real. Medicaid became the state’s biggest budget pressure point after costs exceeded projections, particularly in behavioral health and long-term care. Rather than dramatically cutting eligibility, lawmakers slowed spending growth, delayed expansions, leaned on federal matching dollars and cut elsewhere in the budget to keep the program afloat.Other reductions rippled throughout state government. Agencies were asked to scale back requests. Projects were delayed. Gov. Jared Polis’ request for funding for two new prisons was rejected, with lawmakers instead authorizing the Department of Corrections to explore contracting for beds at previously closed private facilities. Of more than 600 bills introduced this session, many with significant fiscal impacts, were either killed outright or rewritten to reduce costs.Even amid those constraints, lawmakers pursued some of Colorado’s most contentious policy fights.Democrats passed bills allowing lawsuits against federal immigration authorities over alleged constitutional violations and expanding state oversight of immigration detention facilities. Another measure requires colleges and universities with student health centers to provide access to abortion medication. Lawmakers also approved changes to vaccine policy allowing Colorado to rely on guidance from medical organizations instead of federal recommendations.Colorado continued its struggle over firearms regulation. Senate Bill 25-003 creates new training and permitting requirements for purchases of certain semiautomatic firearms beginning Aug. 1. Supporters say it promotes responsible ownership and public safety. Critics argue it infringes on constitutional rights.Reasonable people can disagree on those policies. But public debate still depends on facts.Recently, we published a letter (Herald, May 18) claiming that the law would require hunters to renew their hunter education certification every five years and would give Colorado Parks and Wildlife authority over concealed-carry instruction. According to CPW officials charged with implementing the law, both claims are false. Hunter education remains a one-time certification. The five-year renewal applies only to the firearm safety course required under SB25-003. CPW also says it has no authority over concealed-carry curriculum.Opponents are entitled to challenge the law, criticize its merits or campaign for repeal. But misinformation does not strengthen the argument.The session also exposed tensions over Colorado’s economic future, particularly surrounding artificial intelligence and data centers. Lawmakers approved a compromise AI-regulation bill requiring disclosure when AI influences decisions involving jobs, loans or college admissions, while competing data-center bills failed in the session’s final days. One offered tax incentives to attract development. The other sought stricter water and energy protections.In the end, lawmakers reached no consensus. Colorado will continue without major subsidies for data centers – but also without meaningful statewide guardrails on their environmental impact.The debate underscores Colorado’s difficult balance between climate goals, affordability and competing in the AI economy.Another revealing discussion emerged about prison overcrowding. Senate Bill 159 modestly expands earned-time credits and creates a working group to address chronic overcrowding in state prisons. Supporters described it as pragmatic management of an unsustainable system. Critics called it soft on crime.A letter we publish today from a current inmate argues Colorado’s prison crisis reflects decades of costly expansion and poor management. The point underscores a reality lawmakers must confront: Systems built during years of expansion are becoming increasingly expensive and difficult to sustain.To lawmakers’ credit, not all major legislation fell along partisan lines. Sen. Cleave Simpson helped lead bipartisan legislation addressing Colorado’s growing backlog of mentally ill defendants deemed incompetent to stand trial, while Rep. Katie Stewart advanced bipartisan jail sexual-abuse protections following allegations involving a former La Plata County Jail commander.This session revealed difficult choices shaping Colorado’s future. Faced with painful fiscal constraints, lawmakers still found room for battles over immigration, abortion, firearms, artificial intelligence and criminal justice.Voters will decide whether those were the right priorities.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://www.durangoherald.com/articles/editorials/our-view-colorado-public-lands-day/</link>
        <title>Our view: Colorado Public Lands Day</title>
        <description>The threats have never been more real – or the stakes higher</description>
        <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 05:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">3A95AF39-6C7F-4854-97C9-BC142AD28E02</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[The threats have never been more real – or the stakes higherSince 2016, Colorado has observed the third Saturday in May as Public Lands Day, honoring the role public lands play in the state’s identity, economy and quality of life. In a state where more than 22 million acres are publicly owned, the connection is obvious. Public lands are where families hunt, fish, hike, camp, ski, ride horses, mountain bike, drive OHVs, graze cattle and find solitude. They are also where rural economies survive.But this year’s celebration arrived amid a steady barrage of threats from the Trump administration and congressional Republicans aimed at weakening protections, undermining balanced management and reviving efforts to privatize or sell public lands across the West.On May 11, the administration rescinded the Bureau of Land Management’s Public Lands Rule, which had placed conservation on equal footing with grazing, recreation and energy development. The move adds to a broader rollback of public lands and environmental protections, including efforts to weaken the National Environmental Policy Act and Clean Water Act protections, expand mining near the Boundary Waters and Chaco Canyon, and reduce staffing across federal land management agencies.Now, congressional Republicans are targeting Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument through the Congressional Review Act, seeking to overturn its management plan and reopen it to energy development. On May 14, more than 150 scientists urged Congress to vote no, warning the move threatens one of the nation’s premier laboratories for paleontology, archaeology and ecological research.The threat also has a name. Trump’s nomination of former New Mexico Congressman Steve Pearce to lead the BLM – the agency that manages 245 million acres of federal public land – advanced in the Senate 46-45 on May 11. Pearce has spent his career backing efforts to transfer, sell or otherwise dispose of federal public lands. Putting him in charge of the BLM is not stewardship. It is predation.That is why one bright spot deserves attention right now.Colorado Sen. Michael Bennet's newly introduced Public Lands Integrity Act (Herald, May 1) would close the loophole that nearly allowed public lands to be sold through the federal budget reconciliation process with only a simple majority vote.Rep. Jeff Hurd and other Western Republicans who publicly opposed last year’s proposed sell-offs now have an opportunity to prove those statements were more than rhetoric. House members are reportedly developing a companion bill and seeking bipartisan support, and Hurd should sign on.The proposal should not be controversial – public lands are not a partisan possession. They are part of the shared inheritance of the American West. Ranchers rely on grazing allotments. Hunters and anglers depend on habitat protections. Rural communities depend on tourism, recreation and the quality of life that public lands provide.Outdoor recreation alone contributes $13.9 billion annually to Colorado’s GDP and supports 130,000 direct jobs. Ninety-two percent of Colorado residents participate each year. By direct economic measures, agriculture and extractive industries are smaller contributors – but the real value of agriculture runs deeper.Working ranches and farms preserve open space, maintain wildlife corridors and protect the viewsheds and landscapes that define Colorado’s identity and fuel its outdoor economy. Tip that balance toward extraction and you change the landscape – and undermine the very economy those recreation numbers celebrate.La Plata County has long been ahead of the curve. Commissioners approved a resolution supporting continued federal ownership of public lands in 2015. The following year, Colorado became the first state to designate a Public Lands Day. In April 2025, La Plata County became the first county in the nation to reaffirm that commitment, noting that 42% of the county is federally managed land.Commissioner Marsha Porter-Norton put the issue plainly: “This is the American way of life. And it’s being threatened.”Colorado Public Lands Day is more than a celebration of scenery. It is a reminder that stewardship requires vigilance. Public lands remain one of the few democratic ideas left in American life: places owned equally by everyone, regardless of wealth or politics.Public lands are part of Colorado’s economy, heritage and identity. They deserve more than symbolic praise one Saturday each May. They deserve protection.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://www.durangoherald.com/articles/editorials/my-view-planned-parenthood-is-health-care/</link>
        <title>My view: Planned Parenthood is health care</title>
        <description>And Durango – and our country – needs it</description>
        <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 05:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">796E9ACB-A8C1-4D15-9D10-A49398287983</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[And Durango – and our country – needs itLong before abortion became one of America’s most weaponized political issues, Planned Parenthood was simply where I went for affordable, compassionate health care and contraception as a young college student in Colorado Springs.Like 57% of women, I carried responsibility for birth control, unintended pregnancy and the fear that one life-altering event could derail the future I was trying to build.As I moved across Colorado – Boulder, Steamboat Springs, Silverton and eventually Durango – its presence mattered to me much like mountains, public radio stations, libraries and hot springs. It signaled a community that valued access, education, autonomy and public health.That is why attending Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains' May 6 community open house in Durango felt deeply personal (Herald, May 13).Community members gathered to celebrate the reopening of a health center closed for more than a year by provider shortages and the broader rural health care crisis.Health care workers providing contraception, cancer screenings, sexually transmitted infection testing, wellness exams, gender-affirming care and abortions have long faced harassment, threats and violence simply for doing their jobs. In many communities, including Durango, volunteer clinic escorts have even worn bulletproof vests.In rural America – where physicians are scarce and OB-GYNs are overbooked – clinics like Planned Parenthood are essential infrastructure.After Republicans declined to extend pandemic-era Affordable Care Act tax credits, millions of Americans dropped health coverage altogether. In communities like Durango, where lack of competition already drives up costs, losing affordable access points into health care is devastating.Planned Parenthood's Durango clinic closed in 2024 amid staffing and financial pressures affecting clinics nationwide (Herald, March 22, 2025). Before reopening on a limited schedule, it served about 1,200 patients annually with reproductive and sexual health care, exams and abortion services – remaining the region's only abortion provider.PPRM CEO Adrienne Mansanares spoke during the open house about Planned Parenthood’s commitment to providing a continuum of care throughout people’s lives – from contraception and STI testing to reproductive care, cancer screenings and menopause support.Last month, Fort Lewis College's Turning Point USA chapter hosted Dr. Ingrid Skop speaking on “abortion is not health care.”But abortion is health care, as are miscarriage management, contraception and preventing unwanted pregnancies.So are vasectomies and tubal ligations. Women seeking tubal ligations after childbirth can now face additional surgeries, costs, recovery time and lost wages because Mercy Regional Medical Center no longer performs the procedure under Catholic doctrine.The Supreme Court’s conservative majority dismantled Roe v. Wade, opening the door to this erosion of bodily autonomy.Louisiana sued the FDA to reinstate in-person dispensing requirements, and the conservative Fifth Circuit ruled in the state’s favor, restricting mail access to mifepristone. The Trump administration declined to defend the FDA in court. On Monday, Justice Alito issued a temporary stay keeping mail distribution open until at least Thursday while the Supreme Court deliberates. If restrictions are reinstated, PPRM is prepared to pivot to a misoprostol-only protocol.“It is not the role of courts or politicians to dictate which care options patients are allowed to consider,” Mansanares said.PPRM is also supporting House Bill 1335, advancing this week in Colorado, requiring colleges and universities with student health centers to provide or stock medication abortion unless doing so conflicts with religious beliefs. Mifepristone has been FDA-approved for 25 years and is widely considered safe and effective by major medical organizations.Colorado voters reinforced abortion rights in 2024 by approving Amendment 79, enshrining access into the state constitution. But rights on paper mean little without actual access to care, providers and clinics.I remain grateful Planned Parenthood existed when I needed it as a young woman trying to build a future for myself. And I remain grateful it exists today for young people, working families, LGBTQ patients and women traveling to Colorado from states where reproductive freedom no longer exists – including 12% of the Durango clinic’s patients since reopening, arriving primarily from Texas and Arizona.Amid escalating attacks on women’s autonomy and evidence-based medicine driven by Donald Trump, Republicans and the courts, Planned Parenthood is still doing what it has always done: providing compassionate, affordable care without judgment.Durango should be proud it is here.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://www.durangoherald.com/articles/editorials/our-view-drawing-a-point/</link>
        <title>Our view: Drawing a point</title>
        <description>Editorial cartoons and the role they play in public debate</description>
        <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 04:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">36BC4AC0-9E95-4114-904A-4CF249DF00EE</guid>
        <media:content url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=6528E842-3692-5A9C-AAA0-57283C9CEFC0&#038;function=cropresize&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;q=75&#038;width=1200&#038;x=1.0E-5&#038;y=0.01055195&#038;crop_w=0.99999&#038;crop_h=0.48701299" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" />
        <media:thumbnail url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=6528E842-3692-5A9C-AAA0-57283C9CEFC0&#038;function=cropresize&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;q=75&#038;width=1200&#038;x=1.0E-5&#038;y=0.01055195&#038;crop_w=0.99999&#038;crop_h=0.48701299" />
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Editorial cartoons and the role they play in public debateMay 5 is widely recognized as Cinco de Mayo. As Tom Emery writes in today’s opinion page, it marks a Mexican victory at the Battle of Puebla – not independence, but a moment when a smaller force held its ground against a global power.It is also National Cartoonists Day, tied to the 1895 debut of The Yellow Kid in the New York World, which helped establish cartoons as a regular feature in American newspapers.The 1895 Yellow Kid in the New York World, helped establish cartoons as a regular feature in American newspapers.From America’s separation from the British – including Benjamin Franklin’s 1754 “Join, or Die,” widely considered the first American political cartoon – to today, political cartoons, like writing, work to hold power to account.Published by Benjamin Franklin on May 9, 1754, in the Pennsylvania Gazette, “Join, or Die” is considered the first political cartoon in American history.From the start, there has been a clear distinction. Comic strips are built to entertain. Editorial cartoons are built to comment – and to provoke.They are opinion journalism – usually a single panel using caricature, symbolism and timing to take on current events. Sometimes funny. Often not.That puts them in the same orbit as political humor more broadly. The White House Correspondents Dinner, at least historically, has reflected that understanding: public life invites scrutiny, and occasionally, ridicule.That dynamic has shifted – and intensified.Press freedoms are under attack. Public trust in the press has eroded across the political spectrum, with critics on the left and right questioning bias and fairness.When political leaders repeatedly label journalists “the enemy of the people,” target reporters and pressure networks, it moves beyond criticism. It becomes an effort to intimidate and discredit the press – and a dangerous one – whether in print, on stage or in a drawing.The rhetoric and the risks are real. In 2015, gunmen attacked the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo, killing 12 people after it published cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad. The phrase “Je suis Charlie” spread worldwide in support of free expression.In the United States, those tensions play out under the protections of the First Amendment. Editorial cartoons are part of that landscape – one of the more direct ways a newspaper can express a point of view.Most of the editorial cartoons the Herald publishes are syndicated. The strength of the First Amendment is reflected in the number and variety of political cartoonists. That range of voices continues to examine, question and interpret the decisions of those in power. At The Durango Herald, that tradition is also carried locally by illustrator and cartoonist Judith Reynolds.Reynolds moved to Durango in 1994 after a career in academia and journalism, including work as a reporter and editor in Rochester, New York. When she brought her portfolio to the Herald, publisher Morley Ballantine made a direct request: “Arthur and I have always wanted a political cartoonist focused on local issues.”She asked Reynolds to come back with a few ideas. Reynolds delivered, returning with nine cartoons – including one she worried was too dark. That was the one Ballantine chose to run first.Her cartoons began appearing in March 1995 and ran every Sunday for years. Today, they appear at least monthly – and occasionally more often when a local issue gets her pen moving.Over that time, her work has tracked the issues that define life here: city council decisions, growth and planning, tourism, water, oil and gas, public lands, and the ongoing push and pull between preservation and change.Mortie the Cat appears in many of them – sometimes observing, sometimes adding a note of commentary, sometimes just part of the scene.Readers can learn more about Reynolds’ work and background – and see her first Herald cartoon – in a 2023 Q&A (Herald, April 4, 2023) about her recognition as an Extraordinary Woman Award recipient by the Women’s Resource Center, tied to the Women’s History Month theme “Celebrating Women Who Tell Our Stories.”A selection of that work, spanning three decades, will be on display July 3 at the Durango Creative District Gallery, part of First Fridays and Independence Day weekend.The timing fits. The freedoms that underpin the country – speech, dissent and the ability to question – are what make this work possible.One image, one idea, one point at a time.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://www.durangoherald.com/articles/editorials/our-view-ice-2/</link>
        <title>Our view: ICE</title>
        <description>Colorado is holding the line – for now</description>
        <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 05:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">D1EEC02C-27CE-4C6B-BC8A-2B4D25C2EEB9</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Colorado is holding the line – for nowBefore this administration, ICE officers showed ID. They didn’t wear masks. When they crossed a line, the Justice Department investigated.It largely doesn’t now.What exists instead is video of a masked, federal agent grabbing Durango resident Franci Stagi by the hair, putting her in a chokehold and throwing her down an embankment during a protest outside a local ICE facility. Colorado banned chokeholds after George Floyd’s death. Officer Nicholas Rice didn’t consider that his problem. La Plata County District Attorney Sean Murray did – and filed assault charges this week (Herald, April 24).One line holding.A Denver judge this week also blocked – for the second time – Gov. Jared Polis from handing ICE the personal information of Coloradans who sponsor unaccompanied immigrant children. The subpoena claimed a human trafficking investigation; the judge called it what it was: repackaged. It took a lawsuit to stop it. Polis was prepared to comply. (Herald, April 22)A second line holding – no thanks to the governor.The federal government’s response to the Colorado charges: DHS declared that federal officers can only be investigated by other federal agencies. Self-policing, in other words. Colorado – and Minnesota and Chicago and California, with similar cases – has decided that’s not good enough.Legislators are pushing further. Senate Bill 176 would allow Coloradans to sue federal officials – and yes, state and local officials – for constitutional violations. Critics warn of frivolous suits. But accountability cuts both ways – being sued isn’t the same as losing.Meanwhile, Trump has twice denied Colorado disaster aid for wildfires and flooding – while approving requests from Republican-leaning states at roughly twice the rate of Democratic ones. Colorado’s attorney general Phil Weiser has filed over 60 lawsuits against the administration on multiple fronts. (Herald, April 15)States don’t usually have to protect their residents from their own federal government.We’re there now.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://www.durangoherald.com/articles/editorials/our-view-lands-under-siege/</link>
        <title>Our view: Lands under siege</title>
        <description>Federal actions are weakening protections, expertise and public input</description>
        <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 05:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">E8D5FBC5-7BA9-474A-A822-AB4D4E9D0B88</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Federal actions are weakening protections, expertise and public inputThis week, the U.S. Senate voted 50–49 to overturn a 20-year mining ban on 225,000 acres of the Superior National Forest – upstream from Minnesota’s Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness.That protection, finalized in January 2023 after years of review and roughly 675,000 public comments, was erased with a single vote under the Congressional Review Act.The same law is being used to undo land management plans across the West. Protections at Chaco Canyon face renewed pressure. The Roadless Rule is at risk of repeal.At the same time, the administration is advancing a restructuring of the U.S. Forest Service – closing regional offices and research centers and moving functions to Salt Lake City, Sen. Mike Lee’s backyard. Lee has long advocated selling or transferring federal public lands.We’ve seen it before: the Bureau of Land Management’s move to Grand Junction led to attrition and lost expertise.These changes are not about proximity. About 97% of BLM staff already worked outside Washington, D.C., and most Forest Service lands and staff are in the West. Closing regional offices and research centers removes where forest plans are developed, wildfire and watershed science is conducted, and local knowledge is developed. It pushes decisions away from the ground – and that is the intent.Cuts are already hitting. Since early 2025, more than 5,000 National Park Service, Forest Service and BLM employees have been laid off, including about 1,000 at the Park Service – with more proposed, including a roughly $736 million cut in the 2027 budget that would further reduce scientists, maintenance and resource protection staff.Steve Pearce, awaiting confirmation to lead the BLM, has backed efforts to transfer or sell federal lands.A 2025 federal housing initiative would redefine “multiple use” to include development near communities – potentially including areas around Durango such as Animas Mountain, Sailing Hawks, Horse Gulch and Twin Buttes.Interior Secretary Doug Burgum has described public lands as a national “balance sheet” expected to generate returns – a view shared by this administration that treats them as assets to be liquidated, not stewarded.The direction is clear: weaken protections, sideline public input, strip expertise and open public lands to development.Public lands belong to all Americans and require stewardship – not this.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://www.durangoherald.com/articles/editorials/our-view-kamala-for-governor/</link>
        <title>Our view: Kamala for Governor</title>
        <description>Take a breath, Coloradans – this isn’t our circus. In California, the field for governor just opened up after Rep. Eric Swalwell stepped aside following allegations of sexual assault, rape and harassment involving a staff member. At the same time,...</description>
        <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 05:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">A5FDCF7E-0687-4AE5-BBCB-72D6D64BF5C3</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Take a breath, Coloradans – this isn’t our circus.In California, the field for governor just opened up after Rep. Eric Swalwell stepped aside following allegations of sexual assault, rape and harassment involving a staff member. At the same time, Rep. Tony Gonzalez of Texas faces similar allegations. Different parties. Same problem.It never ends.That moment creates an opening – a chance for Democrats to show better judgment.Kamala Harris should run for governor of California.She should not run for president again. That’s a hard no – not just a bad idea, but tone-deaf.This isn’t about qualifications. Harris has them. This is about electoral reality – and Democrats’ refusal to face it. Rural America rejected Hillary Clinton and has shown no appetite for Harris. Ignore that, and you keep losing.Look at the map.Voters are fed up with the disconnect, the lack of accountability and a government that isn’t working for them.That frustration feeds a broader distrust Democrats continue to underestimate – a sense that the party is out of touch, culturally and politically, and unwilling to confront hard truths about electability – that résumés don’t win, they’re losing ground beyond the coasts, voters don’t like being talked down to, identity alone doesn’t carry a campaign, and trust continues to erode.California is different – a deep-blue state where Harris fits, politically and electorally. She could win and govern there.That’s where she belongs.But nationally, Democrats need something else. Someone who can step outside the bubble, speak plainly about values, and connect in the places they’re losing.Someone like Texas state Rep. James Talarico, a young pastor who speaks about faith, service and economic fairness in ways that resonate beyond party lines.They have an opening here.The question is whether they’ll recognize it – or miss it, again.Sacramento makes sense.The White House doesn’t.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://www.durangoherald.com/articles/editorials/our-view-water-conservation/</link>
        <title>Our view: Water conservation</title>
        <description>New restrictions signal a long-term need to reduce demand</description>
        <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 05:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">D71A26A8-A152-4871-BD3E-630E32CB25BC</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[New restrictions signal a long-term need to reduce demandDurango’s new water restrictions reflect a simple reality: Water use must be reduced to avoid future shortages.The city has rightly imposed Stage 1 mandatory drought restrictions (Herald, April 13), now in effect, limiting lawn watering to three days a week with a fixed schedule: odd-numbered addresses Mondays, Thursdays and Saturdays; even-numbered addresses Tuesdays, Fridays and Sundays; no watering on Wednesdays. Irrigation is limited to overnight hours, between 7 p.m. and 9 a.m., to reduce evaporation. The rules also prohibit spraying sidewalks and driveways and curb other nonessential outdoor uses.The restrictions are enforceable under city code, with an emphasis on education and warnings before fines. Still, behavior matters. As discussed at the recent Southwestern Water Conservation District annual seminar (Herald, March 29), water use can increase when restrictions are announced – a familiar response to perceived scarcity that drew laughs. But water cannot be stockpiled, and overuse now only worsens conditions later.That makes the city’s focus clear. A staggering 70% of Durango’s municipal water use goes to irrigation. The city is targeting a 20% reduction in overall demand, which depends on cutting outdoor use. The city is also reducing irrigation at parks and other properties, limiting fleet washing and suspending fire hydrant flushing. The city should also consider expanding nonpotable or gray water use for landscaping, where feasible.The backdrop is clear. Southwest Colorado is in extreme to exceptional drought. Statewide, snowpack is among the lowest on record, with about half the typical moisture in many areas – and worse in others (Herald/AP, April 13). Snow is melting earlier, runoff is reduced and supplies are tightening.This is not a one-year problem. The region has been in a long-term drought cycle for more than 20 years. Short wet periods have not changed that trend. A few spring storms may help temporarily, but they will not close the gap.Other governments are responding. Denver has implemented watering limits, and cities across the West are restricting use. The U.S. Small Business Administration has issued a drought disaster declaration covering 55 of 64 Colorado counties – but not La Plata, Montezuma, Archuleta, San Juan or Dolores counties. The program offers low-interest loans to small businesses and nonprofits, while most farmers and ranchers – including those in Southwest Colorado – must rely on separate U.S. Department of Agriculture programs.The economic signal is as clear as the environmental one: Drought is not just a water issue; it is an economic one.For local businesses, the Southwest Colorado Small Business Development Center in Durango provides no-cost advising, including help accessing SBA disaster loans and other support. At a time when drought is already straining rural economies, that is one more reason federal SBDC funding should be released without delay (Herald, March 27).At the same time, federal policy is moving in the opposite direction. The Trump administration is rolling back clean energy incentives while expanding fossil fuel production and weakening water conservation standards, including efficiency rules for fixtures like showerheads (Herald, June 6, 2025) – doing little to address the underlying driver of drought in the West: a warming climate driven by greenhouse gas emissions – and reinforcing the need for local action.Durango should treat current restrictions as a baseline, not a temporary measure.Reducing consumption will require practical changes: cutting outdoor watering to allowed hours, replacing high-water turf like Kentucky bluegrass with drought-tolerant landscaping, installing smart irrigation controllers and fixing leaks. Indoors, that means low-flow fixtures and running full loads. Businesses should serve water only upon request, and residents should limit home vehicle washing or use commercial car washes that recycle water.None of these steps are new. What has changed is the urgency.The city should also look beyond restrictions to incentives and pricing by expanding tiered rates that reward lower use and charge more for higher consumption, and by building on existing rebates – such as parking strip turf replacement – to support turf conversion, efficient irrigation systems and water-saving fixtures.The city’s previous plan relied heavily on voluntary compliance in early stages. That is no longer sufficient.Durango cannot control supply. It can control demand.The restrictions now in place are a starting point. Avoiding stricter measures will depend on whether residents and businesses take these steps seriously now.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://www.durangoherald.com/articles/editorials/our-view-local-news-day/</link>
        <title>Our view: Local News Day</title>
        <description>The value – and the limits – of community journalism</description>
        <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 05:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">179DDC17-2475-4E38-8711-1574DE812598</guid>
        <media:content url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=1BFFC4AF-003F-5941-86A9-A87FF0DF71DF&#038;function=cropresize&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;q=75&#038;width=1200&#038;x=0.32&#038;y=1.0E-5&#038;crop_w=0.36&#038;crop_h=0.99999" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" />
        <media:thumbnail url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=1BFFC4AF-003F-5941-86A9-A87FF0DF71DF&#038;function=cropresize&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;q=75&#038;width=1200&#038;x=0.32&#038;y=1.0E-5&#038;crop_w=0.36&#038;crop_h=0.99999" />
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[The value – and the limits – of community journalismIn December, a reader asked why the Herald did not explicitly mark Pearl Harbor Day on Dec. 7 (Herald, Dec. 21, 2025). It’s a fair question – and one that opens the door to a broader conversation about how local journalism works and why those decisions matter.Local News DayThe short answer: We did acknowledge the day, though perhaps not in the expected way. A feature on Mountain Middle School eighth-grader Emmett Kane – who wrote a 160-page book on World War II – ran intentionally on Dec. 7, connecting history to a local story and a new generation (Herald, Dec. 7, 2025).That choice reflects the reality of newsroom decision-making.Every day brings a flood of possibilities. Some news comes to us suddenly – a fatal crash, a wildfire, an emergency response that affects public safety, or a tip from a reader. Other stories are more methodical: combing through police blotters, spotting patterns like a string of break-ins, checking meeting agendas, and covering local governments. At the same time, reporters pursue enterprise stories – the kind that require time, multiple sources, and sustained attention.As Managing Editor Shane Benjamin describes it, the newsroom operates with “two burners” – one reacting in real time to breaking news, the other steadily developing deeper stories that require research, context, and verification.We also recognize our limitations. With a small staff, we cannot cover every holiday, ribbon-cutting, or anniversary. What resonates with one reader may not with another. Those are real trade-offs, guided by local relevance, reader impact, and available resources.Our priority is hyperlocal. Readers can get national and international news almost anywhere. What they cannot get elsewhere is consistent, on-the-ground coverage of Southwest Colorado. As Benjamin puts it, “If we don’t cover it, there’s a good chance no one will.”We also serve as the region’s paper of record – documenting public notices, elections, government actions, and community milestones to create a reliable record over time.On Thursday, April 9, newsrooms across the country will mark the inaugural Local News Day – a national effort to reconnect communities with trusted local journalism. It comes as the industry faces challenges but also experiments with new models. New Mexico, for example, has created a state-supported Local News Fund, while nonprofit and collaborative efforts work to fill gaps left by shrinking staffs.At the same time, even legacy institutions are contracting. The Washington Post has reduced its newsroom by roughly a third, including eliminating its Middle East bureau – leaving Americans less informed at a critical time.Closer to home, the stakes are clear. A “news desert” is a community with little or no credible local news – where government meetings go uncovered, decisions happen without scrutiny, and residents rely on rumor, social media or fragmented information. Over time, civic engagement declines, and accountability erodes.Strong local news helps prevent that.It also depends on community participation.If you see news happening, let us know. Email newstips@durangoherald.com or call 970-375-4567. Reporters’ contact information is listed at the bottom of their stories.Community participation is just as important on the opinion pages.We publish columns from elected officials and contributors from across the region and beyond, with a focus on what informs, challenges and resonates with readers.We also write staff editorials – fact-based opinions that aim to inform, provide perspective and sometimes persuade, while educating, explaining, questioning, celebrating, provoking, analyzing and bearing witness.Letters to the editor are central to civic dialogue. They reflect the community back to itself – its concerns, disagreements and values – helping keep the conversation going. We welcome letters in all forms – and while email submissions are preferred for efficiency, handwritten letters remain a meaningful and much-appreciated part of that exchange.Have something to say? Submit a letter or column idea to letters@durangoherald.com or call 970-375-4522. And for National Poetry Month, send us your poems, too.Local journalism is a shared civic effort – and it depends on you. Subscribe, engage and support the local businesses you see advertising in the Herald.In the end, what we cover – and how – is shaped by the community we serve.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://www.durangoherald.com/articles/editorials/our-view-end-the-war-before-the-marines-arrive/</link>
        <title>Our view: End the war before the Marines arrive</title>
        <description>It is not usual to be fighting a war, as the U.S. is, without the country’s leadership offering an explanation for why. For Donald Trump, the reasons can vary, change over time, or be absent altogether. Fresh from plucking Nicolas...</description>
        <pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2026 05:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">7E7121AE-7359-4583-A0DC-6F33FFBDECA1</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[It is not usual to be fighting a war, as the U.S. is, without the country's leadership offering an explanation for why. For Donald Trump, the reasons can vary, change over time, or be absent altogether.Fresh from plucking Nicolas Maduro from power in Venezuela in a crisp middle-of-the-night military raid, the president refocused his attention on Iran. Three weeks ago, broad and sustained U.S. and Israeli air attacks – perhaps at Israel's behest – struck military targets across Iran. The explanation: to free the Iranian people from religious fanaticism, and that Iran was close to using nuclear weapons against U.S. interests.The skilled U.S. and Israeli military quickly claimed the skies over Iran, and an extraordinary number of Iranian leaders were killed by Israeli precision targeting.Ah, the beauty of air power – it's not difficult to imagine the president thinking.But maintaining an attack-free Strait of Hormuz has proved impossible so far. Iranian missiles and drones from difficult-to-predict shoreline locations have set ships afire, bringing traffic to a halt. Twenty percent of the world's oil supplies sit at anchor, unmoving. Allied nations – not consulted about the war, their NATO contributions dismissed, and threatened with tariffs – aren't interested in helping. For good reason.Two units of U.S. Marines are now on their way. While the president promised no boots on the ground, that's what Marines do. Iran is not Venezuela. We hope he realizes that.Call it a win now, before the Marines arrive and before Iran splinters into civil war with unknown consequences for the U.S. We'd like to believe that even the president's most ardent supporters don't want American military men and women on Iranian soil.Now, about why we're there? Let's see what the president says before the Marines reach shore.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://www.durangoherald.com/articles/editorials/our-view-trump-back-in-hurds-corner/</link>
        <title>Our view: Trump back in Hurd’s corner</title>
        <description>Rep. Jeff Hurd of Colorado’s 3rd Congressional District is back in Donald Trump’s good favor. Not that long ago, the president faulted Hurd for opposing his tariffs on Canada and said he’d support party challenger Hope Scheppelman rather than Hurd’s...</description>
        <pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2026 05:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">A952E8F8-6307-43A1-AD51-C96E28AAA8BD</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Rep. Jeff Hurd of Colorado's 3rd Congressional District is back in Donald Trump's good favor. Not that long ago, the president faulted Hurd for opposing his tariffs on Canada and said he'd support party challenger Hope Scheppelman rather than Hurd's reelection effort.According to a news story, Scheppelman is no longer in the race, a position in the president's administration has been promised to her, and Trump has returned to endorsing Hurd (Herald, March 22).We have no insight into how this change of political heart occurred. Perhaps Scheppelman decided that a primary challenge against an incumbent would be a steep hill to climb, which it usually is, and that the certainty of a promised Washington position, though unspecified, had appeal.Or perhaps despite his opposition to the Jan. 6 pardons, support for public lands legislation, and questions about presidential tariff authority, party leadership and polling determined that Hurd's occasional independence was outweighed by his overall reliability as a Republican. Beyond that, a Scheppelman primary win might have proved too extreme for November voters, handing the seat to Democrats. On major issues, Hurd has not taken issue with the president, including everything in the July 2025 One Big Beautiful Bill Act, with its permanent tax reductions and policies.While primaries can include differing points of view that have merit, they can be awkward for candidates who are forced to profess the extremes to be noticed – positions that then set them too far from the mainstream for the November election.Without Scheppelman to contend with – who had a state party leadership position and lives in Bayfield – Hurd can focus his resources on November and any Democratic challenger. Hurd, in his first term, continues to build a record that voters can consider.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://www.durangoherald.com/articles/editorials/dimming-the-light/</link>
        <title>Dimming the light</title>
        <description>Good intentions, bad outcomes for open government</description>
        <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 05:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">C67DA967-E1DD-46B5-95D3-871F5B2EFD82</guid>
        <media:content url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=872F78FD-E956-5F4D-96DC-59A721C6921C&#038;function=cropresize&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;q=75&#038;width=1200&#038;x=1.0E-5&#038;y=0.34624506&#038;crop_w=0.99999&#038;crop_h=0.4743083" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" />
        <media:thumbnail url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=872F78FD-E956-5F4D-96DC-59A721C6921C&#038;function=cropresize&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;q=75&#038;width=1200&#038;x=1.0E-5&#038;y=0.34624506&#038;crop_w=0.99999&#038;crop_h=0.4743083" />
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Good intentions, bad outcomes for open governmentAs Sunshine Week 2026 draws to a close, it's worth measuring the distance between the ideal it represents and the reality of open government in Colorado.Sunshine WeekccaThe ideal is simple: public business is the public's business. In Colorado, those rights are enshrined in the Colorado Open Records Act and the Colorado Open Meetings Law, giving residents the legal right to request records and observe government conducting public business.That right has never mattered more.According to the Pew Research Center, just 22% of Americans now say they trust the federal government to do the right thing – down from 73% in 1958 and near the lowest reading in decades. Trust in the news media is similarly eroded, with Gallup reporting confidence in newspapers and television news has fallen to historic lows. When people trust neither government nor the institutions that cover it, access to public records becomes the foundation of an informed citizenry and a healthy democracy.That foundation has real weaknesses the Colorado legislature has shown no urgency to fix. There is no meaningful penalty when a government body misses a CORA deadline. According to the Colorado Freedom of Information Coalition, the Court of Appeals ruled last year that CORA’s response deadlines are not enforceable in court, even when missed by months. A law without teeth is more suggestion than statute.The administrative burden on governments is also real. Local agencies are processing record numbers of requests with limited staff and budgets. For three consecutive years, legislation has been introduced to extend response times from three working days to five. The sponsors argued – not unreasonably – that records custodians are overwhelmed. Two of La Plata County’s legislators – Sen. Cleave Simpson and Rep. Katie Stewart – supported Senate Bill 25-077, the most recent version.But Gov. Jared Polis vetoed it, and his objections cut to the heart of why good intentions can become bad policy. The bill gave custodians too much power to define who qualifies as a journalist and created unequal timelines for identical requests. “All legitimate requests for public transparency under CORA should be treated equally under the law,” Polis wrote. The Herald’s editorial board agrees. The most recent version died in committee March 5 – a victory the Colorado Freedom of Information Coalition rightly celebrated.The answer to administrative strain is better resourcing, not longer delays. The city of Durango deserves credit for purchasing a roughly $10,000 automated system that, according to City Clerk Faye Harmer, cuts processing time by half or more (Herald, March 15). Not every local government has that capacity, but Durango’s investment points toward the right solution.Where the Legislature’s record becomes harder to defend is on open meetings. In 2024, Democrats passed Senate Bill 24-157, effectively exempting state lawmakers from open meetings requirements. The Colorado Freedom of Information Coalition said it permits “an endless series of sub-quorum discussions of pending legislation via emails, texts and phone calls” with no public notice or record. Gov. Polis signed it during Sunshine Week 2024. Legislators gave themselves a carve-out they would never extend to local governments and school boards.The costs of secrecy are real. The ethics case against former Infrastructure Advisory Board member John Simpson turned, in part, on CORA (Herald, Jan. 14). A district court found Simpson violated the law when he withheld emails sought by the Herald and claimed his communications were immune from records requests. To date, the city has paid an estimated $177,379.81 in legal fees.A bipartisan ballot initiative backed by the Independence Institute and the League of Women Voters of Colorado would insert a “fundamental right to know the affairs of government” into the state constitution (Colorado Newsline, March 15). If the Legislature won’t strengthen transparency from within, voters may mandate it from without – as Coloradans did in 1972 when they passed the original Sunshine Law.The sun shines whether government welcomes it or not. Coloradans deserve representatives who welcome the light, not those who seek to dim it.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://www.durangoherald.com/articles/editorials/save-act-no-need/</link>
        <title>SAVE Act? No need!</title>
        <description>Voter fraud is vanishingly rare. The damage this bill would do is not.</description>
        <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 11:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">819C2400-D864-4179-86A0-DDAFD2432973</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Voter fraud is vanishingly rare. The damage this bill would do is not.There is no epidemic of noncitizens stealing American elections. There never was. And yet here we are, watching Senate Republicans burn legislative oxygen on the so-called Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act – a bill its own supporters cannot defend with evidence, because the evidence does not exist (Herald, March 18).The Brennan Center for Justice found voter fraud incident rates between 0.0003 and 0.0025% – statistically indistinguishable from zero. The conservative Heritage Foundation's own fraud database contains just 68 total cases of noncitizen voting going back to the 1980s. Federal courts in Arizona concluded that noncitizen voting there is “quite rare, and noncitizen voter fraud rarer still.”The facts are settled. The SAVE Act is not about facts. It's about fear – and November.Trump has peddled the lie of rampant voter fraud since before he won his first election. After 2020, his campaign filed 62 lawsuits challenging the results. Sixty-One were rejected. His own attorney general rejected it. His own election security officials called 2020 the most secure in American history. The lie persisted anyway, because it was never about truth. It was about manufacturing a crisis to justify a solution designed to shrink the electorate.That manufactured crisis has reached Colorado. The Trump administration demanded the state hand over voters' driver's license numbers and partial Social Security numbers. Secretary of State Jena Griswold refused, correctly, saying the Department of Justice had no legal right to the data. The administration sued – one of 18 states targeted in a campaign that voting rights attorneys warn could purge tens of millions from voter rolls before the midterms.Senate Majority Leader John Thune knows this bill cannot pass. Republicans hold 53 seats; they need 60 to break the filibuster. Rather than shelve it, Thune is stretching debate for a week or more – theater to appease Trump and force Democrats to defend a position most Americans already hold: that voting should not require a bureaucratic gantlet.The bill's requirements are severe. Some 21.3 million eligible citizens – 9% of voting-age Americans – lack proof of citizenship readily available. Fewer than half hold a valid passport. Married women who changed their names could need birth certificates, marriage licenses and more just to register. In New Hampshire, enforcing a similar law, one woman was turned away from her town election because her decades-old marriage certificate was in another state. That is not an isolated incident – that is 69 million American women.A narrower photo ID requirement might have earned genuine bipartisan support – and that is a conversation worth having. But requiring a passport or birth certificate to register is not a reasonable safeguard. It is an obstacle course that falls hardest on the elderly, the poor and communities of color.Rep. Jeff Hurd voted yes – twice. He has shown commendable independence on tariffs and public lands. On this, he is wrong, and he should know it.Trump has said the SAVE Act will “guarantee” Republicans win the midterms. He is not wrong about why he wants it. His tariffs represent the largest U.S. tax increase as a share of the economy since 1982, costing the average household an estimated $1,500 this year. Medicaid faces historic cuts. Health care marketplace premiums are surging after his party let enhanced tax credits lapse. Gas prices jumped nearly a dollar a gallon in a single week in Durango – the result of a war with Iran he promised never to fight. His approval ratings are underwater on virtually every economic issue that touches working families.When your record is that unpopular, you don't run on it. You conjure a phantom threat, wrap it in the flag, and dare your opponents to defend democracy out loud.American elections are not overrun with fraud – not nationally, not in Colorado, not in La Plata County. What is actually under threat is not the integrity of our elections, but the access of millions of eligible Americans to participate in them.The Herald’s editorial board calls on Senate Democrats to hold firm, calls on Rep. Hurd to reconsider what this bill actually does to real voters in his district, and calls on all readers to see the SAVE Act plainly: not election protection, but election manipulation – dressed in the language of the very thing it is designed to undermine.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://www.durangoherald.com/articles/editorials/our-view-trump-breaks-with-hurd/</link>
        <title>Our view: Trump breaks with Hurd</title>
        <description>Tariff vote costs Hurd Trump&apos;s support</description>
        <pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2026 05:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">AA6140C2-FD45-4EE6-A108-675C986746C1</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Tariff vote costs Hurd Trump's supportJeff Hurd, the Republican from Grand Junction representing Colorado’s 3rd Congressional District, has fallen out of favor with President Donald Trump. In mid-February, Trump rescinded the reelection endorsement he had given Hurd in the fall of 2025 (Herald, Feb. 26).The break came after Hurd joined a handful of House Republicans opposing the president’s use of a “national emergency” declaration to impose a 25% tariff on much of Canada’s imports into the United States.Hurd said Canada’s alleged failure to adequately prevent fentanyl from entering the U.S. was not sufficient justification for such a declaration.Trump is now backing Hurd’s Republican primary challenger, Hope Scheppelman of Bayfield, a strong MAGA supporter and former vice chair of the Colorado Republican Party. Party primaries are scheduled for the end of June.Responding to the loss of Trump’s support, Hurd said he favors domestic industry and fair trade but does not agree with the way tariffs have been imposed. In this case, he told a Herald reporter, “If I wouldn’t want a future Democratic president using broad emergency powers this way, I shouldn’t support it now.”Tariffs were also an issue earlier in the president’s term when policy frequently shifted. Hurd gave the president some room at the time, saying tariffs could initially be imposed by the president but should be affirmed by Congress after a period of time. The Constitution, of course, assigns the authority to set tariffs to Congress, not the nation’s chief executive.Hurd has also criticized pardons for Jan. 6 offenders and joined Sens. Michael Bennet and John Hickenlooper in advocating for certain public lands protections. With those positions, his independence was likely already approaching the president’s tolerance threshold. The Canada tariff dispute pushed him past it.Here’s hoping Hurd can continue, at least occasionally, to push back against the ideological lockstep demanded by Donald Trump and largely unchallenged by most Republicans. Doing so means supporting what makes sense for Americans and what the Constitution requires.Such independence cannot be routine without risking standing with the party’s House leadership. But moments like this matter. History will remember those who did not always follow Donald Trump when the Constitution and common sense pointed another way.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://www.durangoherald.com/articles/editorials/our-view-film-and-freedom/</link>
        <title>Our view: Film and freedom</title>
        <description>Film as refuge during unprecedented times</description>
        <pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2026 05:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">C16EC33B-CFE9-43D0-B49F-CA6C7AF3B22B</guid>
        <media:content url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=B56AD307-6445-5D64-B507-7D17FC1C0C32&#038;function=cropresize&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;q=75&#038;width=1200&#038;x=1.0E-5&#038;y=1.0E-5&#038;crop_w=0.99999&#038;crop_h=0.49751244" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" />
        <media:thumbnail url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=B56AD307-6445-5D64-B507-7D17FC1C0C32&#038;function=cropresize&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;q=75&#038;width=1200&#038;x=1.0E-5&#038;y=1.0E-5&#038;crop_w=0.99999&#038;crop_h=0.49751244" />
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Film as refuge during unprecedented timesThere is something quietly radical about sitting in a dark theater this week.President Trump and his administration launched what critics — including some Republicans — called a series of illegal military actions since taking office — at least seven unauthorized strikes against boats in the Caribbean, covert operations targeting Venezuela's Nicolás Maduro, and now massive, ongoing strikes against Iran's nuclear sites in conjunction with Israel, begun in the middle of the night Friday — none authorized by Congress, the only body the Constitution empowers to declare war. At home, families are being separated, communities destabilized, and our feeds flooded with fear.And yet — March 4 through 8, Durango gathers to watch, listen, and connect over film.It is in moments like these that people often turn to art. Film is a magnificent place to breathe — not because the movies are always happy, but because good storytelling restores our capacity to feel, think, and stay human.DIFF program cover 2026ccaThe 21st Durango Independent Film Festival arrives with 82 films plus special programs from more than 50 countries. It is also, honestly, a luxury — others are living the emergency, not watching from a distance.Taking a breath is not apathy. It is survival.DIFF works hard to lower the gate. Free opening night screenings Wednesday, March 4 — sponsored by The Durango Herald — kick things off at 6:30 and 7 p.m. at the Durango Arts Center and Gaslight Twin Cinema. The week is packed with free talks, panels, and filmmaker events; visit durangofilm.org.A special screening of Buster Keaton's silent classic Steamboat Bill Jr. features live musical accompaniment by local ragtime legend Adam Swanson — an international champion bringing the 1920s roaring back. Reel Learning hosts live screenings at Ignacio and Animas High School and virtual programs throughout Durango School District. Native Lens, co-hosted by RMPBS and KSUT Tribal Media Center, amplifies Indigenous voices. Student films screen free Saturday at 2 p.m. at the DAC.ADAPTED, by 2012 Durango High School graduate Paul Bikis, follows three paralyzed athletes — rafting the Salmon River, handcycling Canyonlands' White Rim Trail, ascending Mount Baker — a love letter to outdoors and inclusion (Herald, Feb. 27). Bikis hopes audiences leave not just inspired, but normalized — seeing adaptive athletes and thinking: that's cool, I want to do that too.Still Water, part of the Oil and Water documentary shorts program, by Colorado College students Charlie Marks, Matan Fields, Jessica Duran, and Ellie Lacasse, examines how historical water laws shape today's water crisis through the stories of Colorado and Dolores River water users, including the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe. Both represent emerging filmmakers proving you don't need a Hollywood budget — just a story worth telling.Also recommended: Lost Wolves of Yellowstone; Yanuni, about a Brazilian activist igniting a national movement; Voices: The Danny Gans Story, a son's portrait of Las Vegas's most celebrated — and mysterious — entertainer; and Broken Voices, a European choral mystery.Phone cameras have become tools of witness, accountability, and resistance. As Durango has debated the rise of Flock surveillance cameras (Herald, Dec. 15), we're reminded the camera cuts both ways. “Start with your phone,” Marks says. “Find a story you're passionate about. Don't be afraid to make mistakes — make one, and you won't make it again.” It remains one of the most democratic tools we have.DIFF remains something Sundance and Telluride can't replicate: filmmakers and audiences shoulder to shoulder.Festival director Carol Fleischer says it best: "Strike up a conversation with a stranger. See a film you'd never see anywhere else and talk about it. Connect — with a kindred spirit, a story, the place itself." To the volunteers, staff, sponsors, and every viewer who shows up: thank you.The festival is accessible with a $90 six-punch pass that can be shared; El Moro Restaurant is celebrating DIFF's 21st with 21% off your tab for pass holders. Festival HQ opens Monday, March 2 at Four Leaves Winery — weekdays 11:30 a.m.–5:30 p.m., Thursday–Saturday 8:30 a.m.–5:30 p.m. — the week's hub for filmmakers and festivalgoers.Go. Bring a friend. Share your punch pass. Raise a glass of SKA Brewing's INDIE IPA — the official festival beer — to DIFF's 21st birthday and many more.The world will still be there when the lights come up — but you may be better equipped to face it.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://www.durangoherald.com/articles/editorials/in-their-own-words-hello-neighbor/</link>
        <title>In their own words: Hello neighbor</title>
        <description>On flags, sacrifice, and the right to dissent</description>
        <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 05:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">8C899DED-BAC6-4C4B-BE25-4550B985093D</guid>
        <media:content url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=D67D1356-2361-5B22-9BCD-3C03FC084270&#038;function=cropresize&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;q=75&#038;width=1200&#038;x=1.0E-5&#038;y=1.0E-5&#038;crop_w=0.99999&#038;crop_h=0.99999" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" />
        <media:thumbnail url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=D67D1356-2361-5B22-9BCD-3C03FC084270&#038;function=cropresize&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;q=75&#038;width=1200&#038;x=1.0E-5&#038;y=1.0E-5&#038;crop_w=0.99999&#038;crop_h=0.99999" />
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[On flags, sacrifice, and the right to dissentEditor's Note: The following is an exchange of letters between neighbors. The first letter was delivered anonymously to Schwob's mailbox on February 18. Her response appears second. Both are published here in full and without edits.The Original Letter – Received Anonymously, Feb. 18Hello Neighbor,I'm so sorry that you hate our country so much that you feel the need to dishonor all Veterans and First Responders and their families by displaying your American flag at your home upside down. It is very disappointing to see.Flying the flag in this manner is widely viewed as a sign of disrespect toward Veterans, Law Enforcement, and First Responders who have sacrificed significantly for our country. To those who have served and to the families of those who have lost loved ones, this display is deeply offensive and dishonors their contributions to all our freedoms.I'm sure you have never sacrificed for your country, or you would understand what people who serve, have given up for people like you. Literally life and limb.While I recognize you have the right to display signs and hang your flag as you choose, I hope you understand that doing so in this way conveys a message of hostility toward those who serve. Your silly signs displayed in your home's windows say “Love” but show no “Love” to the people that sacrifice so much for everyone else.I encourage you to visit the local VFW for one of their weekend breakfasts, it is only a short walk away. Speaking with the veterans there might provide a different perspective on what the flag represents.I hope you will consider how your decisions affect and hurt others in our community.Regards,Your Neighbors(unsigned)An American flag displayed upside-down – a recognized distress signal and constitutionally protected form of protest. Photo courtesy of Aline C. SchwobThe Response – Signed and Delivered in ReturnDear “Anonymous Neighbors,”You don't know me or you wouldn't have put this letter in my mailbox on Feb. 18. Let me tell you why that flag is a sign of distress for this country and my family.My father joined the U.S. Army at age 17 and subsequently spent 21 years in the service of this country, including World War II. My brother joined the army (he was not drafted), he was sent to Vietnam in 1967 and was killed there at age 19. So yes, me and my family do, in the worst possible way, understand sacrifice for this country.My father and brother were true patriots and would be appalled at the false patriotism exhibited by folks who wrap themselves in the flag while trying to destroy our democracy by working to suppress the vote, limit free speech by intimidation, and by the shameful spectacle of armed, masked, and unidentified thugs killing demonstrators in Minnesota.The upside-down flag is a symbol of distress and is not a sign of disrespect for veterans, law enforcement, or first responders. It is protected by the First Amendment as free speech/protest. My so-called “silly sign” in the window clearly states what we stand for.My regards to you as well,Aline C. Schwob(not anonymous)P.S. I would be pleased to discuss this with you should you care to reveal your identity.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://www.durangoherald.com/articles/editorials/guest-commentary-when-process-fails-democracy-fails/</link>
        <title>Guest commentary: When process fails, democracy fails</title>
        <description>Democracy depends on real processes: public hearings where people testify, scientific review grounded in evidence, opportunities for public comment and courts that uphold the law. Feb. 12, when the EPA eliminated its authority to regulate greenhouse gases, what fell was...</description>
        <pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2026 05:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">5D95F1CA-8883-4D81-898E-5AA6ECC5A62E</guid>
        <media:content url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=18C274B5-DAF7-5E1C-BCB6-A25DC99D45CA&#038;function=cropresize&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;q=75&#038;width=1200&#038;x=1.0E-5&#038;y=0.14901593&#038;crop_w=0.99999&#038;crop_h=0.56232427" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" />
        <media:thumbnail url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=18C274B5-DAF7-5E1C-BCB6-A25DC99D45CA&#038;function=cropresize&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;q=75&#038;width=1200&#038;x=1.0E-5&#038;y=0.14901593&#038;crop_w=0.99999&#038;crop_h=0.56232427" />
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Democracy depends on real processes: public hearings where people testify, scientific review grounded in evidence, opportunities for public comment and courts that uphold the law. Feb. 12, when the EPA eliminated its authority to regulate greenhouse gases, what fell was both an environmental protection and the democratic process that created it.Liane JollonccaThe reversal of the 2009 Endangerment Finding – a formal determination by the EPA confirming that greenhouse gases endanger public health and are leading causes of climate change – happened in mere months. The reversal relied on an Energy Department report that a federal judge ruled violated public transparency laws and was finalized without adequately addressing more than half a million public comments, many of which opposed the rollback. The contrast could not be clearer. The original Endangerment Finding was reached over years, informed by decades of peer-reviewed science; affirmed by the Supreme Court and the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; and supported by multiple public hearings and more than 380,000 public comments.For local-level elected officials, this isn’t abstract. County commissioners, city council members, tribal leaders and other officials spent years documenting pollution impacts in their communities, testifying at hearings, gathering data and working across party lines. They proved that this democratic system works and that local and tribal officials play vital roles in improving their communities.When democracy works, communities can protect what they value. Local leaders and their communities identify problems, share evidence and tell federal leaders what they need. Policy responds. For example, after years of testimony from local officials about the impacts of gas and oil operations – including pollution carrying toxic chemicals that contribute to thousands of premature deaths and hundreds of thousands of asthma attacks each year – new protections were added to the 2009 Finding, and they delivered both health and economic benefits. For example, New Mexico alone has captured $125 million in previously wasted natural gas, adding $27 million in royalties and revenue for taxpayers. At the same time, climate pollution mitigation has helped build a new domestic industry and create new jobs, with over 200 companies operating in more than 1,000 locations nationwide.Today, hard-won health and climate protections face profound uncertainty. When regulatory decisions move away from established science, legal precedent and years of public input – and instead align more closely with industries that spent over $450 million on the most recent election cycle – whose voices are shaping policies that should protect communities? We can’t protect the environment without protecting our democracy.We’ve also learned that we can’t sustain democracy when our communities are overwhelmed by environmental disasters. When your town evacuates from a wildfire or flood, participating in governance becomes exponentially harder. Strong democratic institutions allow communities to identify threats and work toward solutions before catastrophe strikes.Democracy doesn’t just happen in Washington. It happens when you vote in every election, show up at city council meetings when decisions affecting your community are being made, speak up against election misinformation and support local officials who govern with integrity. The democratic processes that protect our air, water and land also protect our right to fair elections, accountable government and a voice in what comes next.The same local, tribal, and state officials who helped build federal environmental protections through democratic processes are still organizing and continuing the work. They understand what’s at stake – not just clean air and water, but communities’ very ability to shape their own futures. And together we know what democracy has already delivered, and what it can still make possible.Guest commentary by Liane Jollon, executive director of Western Leaders Network and Appalachian Leaders Network, organizations that harness the power of local, tribal and state elected and appointed officials to address the climate crisis, advance conservation initiatives and protect democracy. She’s the former director of the former San Juan Basin Public Health. Jollon served on the Herald’s 2017-18 Editorial Advisory Board. Ellen Stein returns Feb. 27.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://www.durangoherald.com/articles/editorials/guest-commentary-one-nonsensical-ploy-after-another/</link>
        <title>Guest commentary: One nonsensical ploy after another</title>
        <description>If coal is the abundant, cheap energy source that the president keeps telling us it is, then it stands to reason that ordering coal-fired generating stations to remain open would mean lower electricity rates. It would also mean more pollution,...</description>
        <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2026 05:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">C4A3FB03-BB2E-48E8-BE61-7DF4CAFEBD58</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[If coal is the abundant, cheap energy source that the president keeps telling us it is, then it stands to reason that ordering coal-fired generating stations to remain open would mean lower electricity rates.It would also mean more pollution, but we couldn’t blame Americans if they welcomed cheaper utility bills amid an ongoing affordability crisis.But that’s not the tradeoff that the Trump administration is forcing onto consumers – at least not those served by the rural electric co-ops that make up the Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association.An executive order preventing the retirement of a coal-fired power plant in Craig is for the benefit of the coal industry at the expense of everyday ratepayers who get nothing out of the deal except higher bills and more carbon pollution.And it’s happening under the questionable proposition that the nation is in the midst of an energy emergency. If there is an emergency, this isn’t the way out – as the owners and operators of the Craig Unit 1 coal-fired plant made abundantly clear in a petition to the U.S. Department of Energy on Jan. 29.They joined the Colorado attorney general and a coalition of environmental groups opposing an order to keep the Craig plant open beyond its planned 2025 retirement date.It would be one thing for the government to provide money to reboot the plant. But that’s not the case. The owners note they let important maintenance lapse knowing the plant was to be shuttered at the end of the year. Fixing those issues will be even more costly and the expense falls on the shoulders of rural electric co-op members who pay the bills through electric rates.As part of Colorado’s transition to renewable energy, the Craig plant’s owners planned for the retirement of the facility for more than a decade and “proactively” replaced the electrical generation capacity from new sources, including the 145MW Axial Basin solar farm in Moffat County.But, as the Colorado Sun’s Michael Booth noted, if the Craig station has to force coal power onto transmission lines, it can’t use the solar power it’s built. There’s only so much transmission capacity in northwest Colorado.These are the kinds of nonsensical directives that energy experts criticize as resembling “central planning” or a “Soviet-style system” by interfering with competitive electricity markets.But Tri-State Generation and partner Platte River Power Authority say the order is more than unwise – it’s unconstitutional.It “effectuates a taking of petitioners’ property under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution without an adequate process to obtain constitutionally required compensation,” they argue. Neither does it meet the DOE requirement for a reasoned finding that compels operation of Craig Unit 1 as the “best solution” to the “identified emergency.”This isn’t the only pushback coming from Colorado in response to Trump directives. As the Sentinel’s Sam Klomhaus reported, Colorado has joined a lawsuit brought by several states against President Donald Trump’s administration alleging Trump declared an “energy emergency” in order to bypass or shorten environmental reviews for projects when no such emergency exists.The lawsuit asks the court to declare the directive illegal and stop agencies from issuing permits under the executive order.This administration is fond of taking emergency action. Last fall, Trump started preparing for an emergency bailout for struggling farmers impacted by tariffs. Isn’t that an emergency he created?Farmers would prefer open markets and a level playing field over handouts. And utility customers would prefer to pay for the cheapest form of electricity.Congress can inject some much-needed rationality by limiting the kinds of actions the president can take to respond to emergencies – or by more clearly defining what constitutes one.Guest commentary courtesy of Andy Smith, Opinion Editor at the Grand Junction Sentinel. Ellen Stein returns Feb. 27.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://www.durangoherald.com/articles/editorials/our-view-underway/</link>
        <title>Our view: Underway</title>
        <description>From civic campus to underpass, Durango builds toward 2030</description>
        <pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2026 05:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">C1B04560-EAAC-4763-8955-6B90A7FB5426</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[From civic campus to underpass, Durango builds toward 2030A buzz is in the air. Two of Durango’s longest talked-about civic projects – decades in the making – are finally underway after 67.5% of voters approved bond measure 2A last April.The renovation of the old Durango High School – known as the Durango 9-R administration building – did not become a new fire station, thanks to citizen advocacy. Instead, the 30-year vision of restoring the stately building at Second Avenue and 12th Street will finally be realized as City Hall on a shared campus with a new Police Department.Camino Crossing is advancing, too. This at least 20-year effort to connect downtown and the Animas River Trail marked 30% design completion at the Powerhouse on Winter Bike to Work Day, where more than 100 residents gathered (Herald, Feb. 14). Design is progressing toward 60 and 90% milestones, with construction anticipated in 2029.City Hall and the Police Department are targeting completion in fall 2028.There is a big reason to keep both projects on track: the 2030 UCI World Mountain Bike Championships. Nothing like hosting the world to get our house in order.These projects are now in detailed design – and that’s where change happens.Mayor Gilda Yazzie’s column (Herald, Jan. 25) outlining updates caught some readers by surprise. For some, it was the first time they had heard that the former Big Picture building would likely be demolished and the underground parking garage scrapped.Questions followed about fidelity to the ballot language authorizing “financing the restoration and equipping of the historic Durango High School building and adjacent facilities” – language that speaks to restoring and equipping, not demolishing.City Attorney Mark Morgan has said the ballot measure did not prescribe a specific site plan and emphasized three commitments: stay within the $61 million debt capacity; renovate the historic high school; and deliver City Hall and Police Department facilities.As engineering advanced late last year, costs tied to Category 4 construction standards exceeded estimates. Housing emergency vehicles underground would trigger heightened snow, seismic, and wind standards and two entrances, making the garage financially unattainable.Renovating the former Big Picture building to those standards would cost within $1 million dollars as building new, without delivering a purpose-built Police Department. The plan pivoted.The Police Department is now proposed as a new building on the north side facing 13th Street. The historic high school will be flanked by surface parking, giving the building room to stand on its own — strengthening the overall design.One misconception persists: Because of security concerns, the center of the campus was never intended to be a public thoroughfare. The updated design introduces a promenade along the west side, a soft-surface trail between 12th and 13th streets, with connections to Buckley Park (yes, the beloved sledding hill remains). Bathrooms are still planned through Parks and Recreation. The alley to the east between 12th and 13th streets is also still in the plans for multimodal improvements.The more difficult conversation is parking. Without the underground garage, the proposal would demolish the current City Hall and Police Department buildings to make way for surface parking, eliminating roughly $7.5 million in anticipated proceeds from selling those properties.It’s time to stop designing our towns around cars.Alternatives remain under discussion, including a potential partnership with La Plata County on a parking structure or the use of the Transit Center through a variance paired with employee incentives.Residents can learn more and weigh in at the Engage Durango forum Feb. 24 from 5 to 6:30 p.m. at the Durango Public Library, and at engage.durangoco.gov/police-department-city-hall.Camino Crossing updates are available at engage.durangoco.gov/caminocrossing. The Camino Crossing Committee (C3), led by the Business Improvement District, meets Feb. 17 from noon to 1 p.m. at The Hive, 1175 Camino del Rio, to support near-term HAWK improvements and long-term funding; residents may attend or email C3@downtowndurango.org for details.After decades of studies and stalled plans, Durango is finally building.The world is coming. Let’s be ready.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>
