<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
    xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
    xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
    <title>Policy and Politics Digest</title>
    <category>Policy and Politics Digest</category>
    <link>https://www.durangoherald.com/section/policy-and-politics-digest/feed/</link>
    <atom:link href="https://www.durangoherald.com/section/policy-and-politics-digest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <description>Stay informed with the latest breaking news, local stories, sports, business, weather, and community events from Durango, Southwest Colorado, and the Four Corners region.</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 10:45:50 -0600</lastBuildDate>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
        <link>https://www.durangoherald.com/articles/policy-and-politics-digest/they-say-all-politics-is-local-then-export-it/</link>
        <title>They say all politics is local. Then export it.</title>
        <description>The result, as Mann depressingly points out, is that government does not get much done — at least at the national level. And the media does a weak job pointing out just how bad things are. “Yet many political scientists,...</description>
        <pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2016 03:32:58 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">A8A97D77-489D-4CD0-85DF-38F767356943</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[It should come as no shock that research is showing our national political system to be more partisan and less effective than ever. And within that partisan divide, there is further imbalance: Republicans are ideologically entrenched far beyond their Democratic brethren. I’m not making this up. Thomas Mann, a senior fellow in governance studies at the Brookings Institution, a nonpartisan think tank, has evidence aplenty proving it. He writes about the trend in The Atlantic: The result, as Mann depressingly points out, is that government does not get much done — at least at the national level. And the media does a weak job pointing out just how bad things are. “Yet many political scientists, like most mainstream journalists and political reformers, refuse to even acknowledge or take seriously the case for asymmetric polarization. It makes us uncomfortable because some people will characterize the idea as partisan, even if it accurately captures reality. We do the public a disservice to say less than we believe to be true and avoid research directions that might produce ‘unbalanced’ results. Insisting on false equivalence in the media or the academy is no virtue,” Mann wrote. He’s right. Even we opinionistas make an effort to find the good on the bad side of things — at least sometimes. So here goes: While our national political system may be frayed to the point of near snapping, our local politics lack the division. Sure there are the occasional ideologically infused debates — bag bans, riverside park management, and comprehensive planning come to mind — but by and large, our systems at the city of Durango and in La Plata County government seem to circumvent entrenchment. While county commissioners are identified by their party, it is not always the foremost consideration for voters. Durango city councilors are elected, on paper at least, absent any party affiliation. Mann argues that a one-party system could be one of a set of tools deployed to fix what ails us. He could be on to something, but perhaps a no-party strategy is one to consider. It is not perfect in these parts, but it works — something Washington D.C. politicians cannot say with straight faces.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://www.durangoherald.com/articles/policy-and-politics-digest/busy-colorado-ballot-will-be-energy-heavy/</link>
        <title>Busy Colorado ballot will be energy-heavy</title>
        <description>Far and away, though, energy-related measures dominate the list of proposed initiatives. There are at least a dozen such initiatives vying for a spot on the ballot. They range from attempts to expand local control over whether gas and oil...</description>
        <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2014 02:47:44 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">DF91D3DF-C7B7-4E7A-8E6A-8424732F8192</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Colorado’s ballots routinely feature citizen-led initiatives to amend statute or, more commonly, the state constitution. While 2013, an off-year election, only saw two statewide initiatives — Amendment 66, the failed school finance measure, and Proposition AA, which enabled Colorado to tax recreational marijuana sales — the list of proposed measures aiming for a spot on the 2014 ballot is lengthy. The age-old attempt to define personhood at conception will once again appear before voters, and a litany of others are awaiting approval. Those include gun-related measures, one that would form a state-owned bank, a labeling requirement for GMO foods, and initiatives addressing health care. Far and away, though, energy-related measures dominate the list of proposed initiatives. There are at least a dozen such initiatives vying for a spot on the ballot. They range from attempts to expand local control over whether gas and oil development occurs in a given community to counter-measures that would limit oil and gas tax revenue for communities in which drilling is banned. The list is long, the topics varied. Taken together, these proposed initiatives provide a crucible in which to conduct the fight over gas and oil development in Colorado. It is a more polarizing environment than doing so through a stakeholder process or via legislative means — either at the municipal or county level, or at the state capitol. Get ready for a politically charged election season, made more so by a ballot full of divisive energy-related measures. Won’t it be fun. http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_25743740/colorado-energy-measures-expected-attract-big-names-deepttp:// http://ballotpedia.org/Colorado_2014_ballot_measures]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://www.durangoherald.com/articles/policy-and-politics-digest/food-safety-rules-must-consider-growing-reality-in-southwest-colorado/</link>
        <title>Food safety rules must consider growing reality in Southwest Colorado</title>
        <description>Of particular concern are proposed rules governing water used to irrigate crops. The FDA is considering two standards — one that would allow no E. Coli at all in irrigation water, and one that would have no more than 235...</description>
        <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2014 06:14:08 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">D715A3C2-62BF-4071-955E-03807A4A7F1B</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[E. Coli is no laughing matter and for that reason, the Food and Drug Administration is right to put extra effort into keeping the bacteria out of the nation’s food supply. The vehicle for addressing the problem is the Food Safety Modernization Act, which has many good standards for how our sustenance is handled prior to arriving in our kitchens — and our guts. Some of the proposed rules, while well-intended, will have unworkably burdensome ramifications for small-scale farming operations. Of particular concern are proposed rules governing water used to irrigate crops. The FDA is considering two standards — one that would allow no E. Coli at all in irrigation water, and one that would have no more than 235 colony forming units, or CFUs, per 100 milliliters. To determine this, farmers would have to conduct frequent — perhaps weekly — testing. Doing so is costly, and the threshold is so low as to be onerous; for comparison, the state of Michigan does not become concerned about its swimming water until levels exceed 300 CFUs, and even that is derived from a mean, of three samples — one could exceed that level if others were lower. This is a challenge for farmers in this region, particularly those running small-scale operations. Surface water — that which flows in rivers, streams and ditches, runs the risk of coming into contact with various bacteria, including E. Coli. Ditch companies routinely test for contaminants, but the FDA would like to up the ante by requiring stringent testing and application procedures for farmers. It is to high a threshold and the agency should consider a more practical set of rules. To his credit, Sen. Michael Bennet is asking the FDA to examine the on-the-ground ramifications of its proposed rules on water as well as those governing various soil amendments. He has invited the FDA to visit Colorado; it would be a trip worth taking. The best intentions that inform a policy’s draft can have drastic and unforeseen in the implementation, and are more likely to do so if the proposal lacks comprehensive context. The FDA has more work to do and should accept Bennet’s invitation. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Food/GuidanceRegulation/FSMA/UCM360242.pdf http://animaswatercompany.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/PORTRAIT_ANIMAS-WC_PWSID_CO0134020_2013ConsumerConfidence-1.pdf]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://www.durangoherald.com/articles/policy-and-politics-digest/are-you-for-or-against-obamacare-show-your-work/</link>
        <title>Are you for or against Obamacare? Show your work</title>
        <description>http://www.cnn.com/2014/04/01/politics/obamacare-signups-target/ http://foxnewsinsider.com/tag/obamacare http://www.msnbc.com/topics/affordable-care-act http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/comment/2014/03/young-healthy-and-not-so-important-for-obamacare.html http://www.cbo.gov/latest/Health-Care/Affordable-Care-Act</description>
        <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 07:33:48 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">AB4C5409-8FFF-4176-B04E-29ECCD341DD4</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[With the final of many deadlines to sign up for health insurance passed, the Obama administration has reached its targeted number of new enrollees. There are now, according to President Barack Obama, 7.1 million Americans who have secured health care coverage under the Affordable Care Act. This has been an intensely divisive process, however, and not helped by technical difficulties that gave legitimate fodder to criticize the law’s roll-out. So now we get down to the business of seeing how the law’s implementation will actually work: for individuals, business owners, health care providers, and state and federal coffers. The polarization that Obamacare engenders will surely remain. Let’s talk here about whether the Affordable Care Act has been a good, bad or inconsequential change for you. Explain, please. Here are a few links to inform your thinking (or not). http://www.cnn.com/2014/04/01/politics/obamacare-signups-target/ http://foxnewsinsider.com/tag/obamacare http://www.msnbc.com/topics/affordable-care-act http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/comment/2014/03/young-healthy-and-not-so-important-for-obamacare.html http://www.cbo.gov/latest/Health-Care/Affordable-Care-Act]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://www.durangoherald.com/articles/policy-and-politics-digest/health-care-savings-an-economic-good-despite-the-sting/</link>
        <title>Health-care savings: An economic good, despite the sting</title>
        <description>It will be interesting to see how the information is politicized, though. It is not difficult to imagine those opposed to certain comprehensive health care legislation using these numbers to decry its effect on the economy. Listen carefully, though, to...</description>
        <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2014 23:23:20 -0700</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">6D877352-40FC-4FF2-827B-59516F7E3A8E</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[In Sunday’s New York Times, Binayamin Appelbaum presented a news analysis of the effect that savings on health care has had on the overall economy. It was an astute breakdown showing that the decline in spending on health care – because of innovation, efficiencies, larger patient cost shares, and, perhaps the Affordable Care Act — has meant that sector of the economy is not bouncing back as quickly from the recession as other areas. While that may be rough for those who work in the industry, it would seem that is a positive long-term trend for the economy and its participants. With fewer of their dollars going to health care, there are more left for other bills — which is primarily where that money seems to be going now, rather than into big purchases. That fiscal discipline today will eventually free consumers to spend. It will be interesting to see how the information is politicized, though. It is not difficult to imagine those opposed to certain comprehensive health care legislation using these numbers to decry its effect on the economy. Listen carefully, though, to those criticisms. With health care spending accounting for more than 17 percent of the gross domestic product in 2012, there is room for some shrinkage — maybe a lot. Read Appelbaum’s full piece here: http://nyti.ms/1g8dMsa.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://www.durangoherald.com/articles/policy-and-politics-digest/canceled-meetings-do-disservice-to-voters/</link>
        <title>Canceled meetings do disservice to voters</title>
        <description>These are friendly and informative conversations where we have the opportunity to get to know candidates who are volunteering for important and largely thankless positions. They also provide candidates the chance to articulate their positions — something that anyone seeking...</description>
        <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2013 04:36:25 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">947C7474-4EB5-460F-B936-935A340BCEBB</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Election season is often a busy time for The Herald’s editorial board, because one of our roles is to weigh in on the various races and ballot questions facing voters. This year, that entails two robust slates of school board candidates vying for seats on the Durango School District 9-R board and that of Bayfield School District 10-JT. In order to craft our endorsements, we meet with the candidates to get a sense of their policy priorities, concerns about the district, and goals for their time serving on the board. These are friendly and informative conversations where we have the opportunity to get to know candidates who are volunteering for important and largely thankless positions. They also provide candidates the chance to articulate their positions — something that anyone seeking public office must be willing to do; voters deserve a clear understanding of where their would-be representatives stand. Those positions are the basis upon which the Herald makes its endorsements and it is not particularly fair to issue them without hearing from all candidates. So it was rather surprising when a candidate for Bayfield’s school board cancelled our interview on Monday because of her anger over a news story covering another candidate’s disqualification from the race. Judy Spady contended that the story (http://www.durangoherald.com/article/20131023/NEWS01/131029822/0/SEARCH/Bayfield-school-board-candidate-disqualified) suggested Justin Ross was disqualified because of his position on evolution, when in fact it was because of his address — he does not live within the district’s boundaries. While the story mentioned Ross’ position on evolution, it was peripheral to the relevant issue: Ross’ home is in the Ignacio district — something he did not know until last week. Spady took an interesting leap from that story, determining it was an indication of the Herald’s liberal, left-leaning bent and declined to meet with our editorial board. What is missing as a result is a clear understanding — from us and, by extension, readers and voters — of her positions. We are left to either fill in with assumptions, or rely on our knowledge of other candidates’ articulated positions to craft our endorsements. While neither is ideal, the latter is far more responsible.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://www.durangoherald.com/articles/policy-and-politics-digest/pancakes-and-policy-meet-with-transportation-discussion/</link>
        <title>Pancakes and policy meet with transportation discussion</title>
        <description>To make things even more interesting, we will hold the gathering at the Kiwanis Club’s annual Pancake Day at the La Plata County Fairgrounds. Come talk transportation and money over pancakes — $10 will cover your breakfast, with proceeds going...</description>
        <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2013 03:33:43 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">DB1F7C6B-C277-464B-A157-7A052E6B87EF</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[The Durango Herald’s next public editorial board meeting will be held at 10:30 a.m. Thursday. This week’s discussion will focus on transportation funding options — an issue that will likely appear on the November 2014 ballot in some to-be-determined form. Stephens Parker, esteemed transportation commissioner emeritus, will be on hand to gather input on the various ideas being considered across the state. To make things even more interesting, we will hold the gathering at the Kiwanis Club’s annual Pancake Day at the La Plata County Fairgrounds. Come talk transportation and money over pancakes — $10 will cover your breakfast, with proceeds going to the club’s youth programs in the county. Come! Contact me at meg@durangoherald.com or (970) 749-7684 for more information. To make things even more interesting, we will hold the gathering at the Kiwanis Club’s annual Pancake Day at the La Plata County Fairgrounds. Come talk transportation and money over pancakes — $10 will cover your breakfast, with proceeds going to the club’s youth programs in the county. Come! Contact me at meg@durangoherald.com or (970) […]]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://www.durangoherald.com/articles/policy-and-politics-digest/city-looks-in-wrong-direction-for-cuts/</link>
        <title>City looks in wrong direction for cuts</title>
        <description>The program — as well as weekend Trolley service — is on the chopping block for the 2014 budget cycle and it should not be. City Manager Ron LeBlanc’s justification for the cut is that the city should not be...</description>
        <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 03:57:24 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">1BEBBCC8-3231-487A-82DB-164B12F9178F</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[The city of Durango’s Buzz Bus program is an example of government reflecting community values through the services it offers. The bus, which runs Friday and Saturday nights, offers riders an affordable and safe way to get home. For $5, any number of potential hazards vanish — the most extreme of which include DUI or DWAI incidents or compromised personal safety. The city’s investment in the program is praiseworthy and just the sort of thing it ought to be doing with its transportation dollars. It keeps citizens safe and does so at a rate most can afford. The program — as well as weekend Trolley service — is on the chopping block for the 2014 budget cycle and it should not be. City Manager Ron LeBlanc’s justification for the cut is that the city should not be subsidizing transportation out of its general fund and that parking meters are not generating enough to offset the increased ridership. While the balance sheet perspective is sound, the notion of reducing supply of services that are in increasing demand is not. Instead, the city should either increase fees or invest in the needed and useful transportation services it has built. There are many a reason why: liveability, safety, accessibility, conservation, congestion, and economic development, to name a few. http://www.naccho.org/advocacy/testimony/loader.cfm?csModule=security/getfile&PageID=193952 http://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/blog/survey-investing-mass-transit-key http://www.planetizen.com/node/64650]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://www.durangoherald.com/articles/policy-and-politics-digest/patience-precision-key-to-pot-regs/</link>
        <title>Patience, precision key to pot regs</title>
        <description>Colorado is at the leading edge of the discussion, with voters in November having soundly supported legalizing marijuana cultivation, possession and sale for recreational purposes. From a values standpoint, this was a relatively short leap from the legalization of medicinal...</description>
        <pubDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2013 08:48:54 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">ED150E79-6C67-4C97-B911-71811A0DB944</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[The live-action policy development surrounding marijuana use is a good time for headline writers and anyone who likes stoner jokes. It is also rich fodder for those interested in how various jurisdictions interrelate and how mores, laws and norms evolve to reflect changing values. It is a complicated process that lawmakers at all levels are right to address with caution. Colorado is at the leading edge of the discussion, with voters in November having soundly supported legalizing marijuana cultivation, possession and sale for recreational purposes. From a values standpoint, this was a relatively short leap from the legalization of medicinal marijuana use – legalized by voters in 2000. Let’s face it: the “severe pain” that 94 percent of the 106,817 current medical marijuana cardholders in the state name as the primary symptom they treat with marijuana is a handily difficult to define condition. That’s just fine, though. Board-certified physicians – 800 of them across the state – are playing along and there is little if any harm in the whole package. Those who are legitimately medically helped by marijuana can enjoy that treatment option and those who enjoy its effects on their “pain,” or what have you, can as well. There is an effective regulatory framework tracking the production and sale of the “medicine,” and all is well across the land, as far is it goes. That medicinal shoehorn served as a lovely proxy for what is really going on: Marijuana is transitioning into the mainstream of mind-altering substances, joining its legal – but nonetheless taboo – brother, alcohol, in the social and policy arenas. That is not necessarily a simple leap to take, though. Congress, under the 1970 Controlled Substances Act, identifies marijuana as a Schedule I substance – that is one that meets the following no-good criteria: “The drug or other substance has a high potential for abuse. “The drug or other substance has no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States. “There is a lack of accepted safety for use of the drug or other substance under medical supervision” Among its cohorts on the schedule are heroin, MDMA, LSD and peyote. Notably, cocaine and amphetamines are on Schedule II – making them acceptable for medical use, albeit in limited applications. So marijuana, by act of Congress, is ganja non grata at the federal level. What’s a state to do? Wait for federal government guidance on just how seriously it takes its own laws, apparently. That guidance on recreational marijuana laws came, finally, on Thursday and it is much like that issued previously on medicinal use. And while the memo from the Justice Department provides clarity in its enforcement priorities, it is just as clear in saying that marijuana use remains illegal at the federal level. In articulating the things the Justice Department is most concerned about – keeping marijuana out of minors’ hands and bodies, stopping marijuana dealing and related violence by gangs and cartels, preventing sales in states where it is not legal, using state licenses to engage in illegal trafficking, driving while under the influence of marijuana, growing or possessing marijuana on federal lands, for example – the attorney general’s office has clarified the landscape while leaving considerable haze on the enforcement. The memo relies heavily on the states to regulate marijuana in keeping with the Justice Department’s priorities, and in so doing creates a workable federalist balance that recognizes states’ rights while still flexing federal muscle. But there is a clear message that if states and localities fail to properly regulate and enforce laws supporting those priorities, the Justice Department reserves the right to take action. “If state enforcement efforts are not sufficiently robust to protect against the harms set forth above, the federal government may seek to challenge the regulatory structure itself, in addition to continuing to bring individual enforcement actions, including criminal prosecutions, focused on those harms,” the memo said. Given that clear but still somewhat squishy guideline – around a federally illegal substance – it is fair for both the state and its localities to err on the side of caution in crafting regulations. La Plata County commissioners came under fire this week for enacting a temporary ban on recreational marijuana sales, and while critics’ complain about dithering in implementing the voters’ mandate is somewhat legitimate, there are more complex relationships and dynamics at play. The county’s desire to be extra prudent in crafting its regulations is defensible and responsible, and while it could be read as a violation of voters’ will, a more generous assessment is that the commissioners are exercising sound policy development skills. The times, they are a-changing – and quickly. Recreational marijuana users can now partake without fear of punishment, and the convenience of retail purchase is just around the corner. Getting the details right on the legal side is important, though, and since the whole system is taking place because of a giant federal wink and nod, patience and precision is appropriate. Megan Graham is a Herald editorial writer and policy analyst. Reach her at meg@durangoherald.com.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://www.durangoherald.com/articles/policy-and-politics-digest/marijuana-fades-into-sunset-of-citizens-concerns/</link>
        <title>Marijuana fades into sunset of citizens’ concerns</title>
        <description>Despite the fact that both the city of Durango and La Plata County are considering moratoriums on recreational marijuana businesses until the devilish details are ironed out, and that a previously illegal substance is now perfectly legal, these are not...</description>
        <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2013 05:05:17 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">D5B939C6-0B28-44FC-9CE4-7A7A1A6B45C7</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[At last week’s public editorial board meeting, we thought we had come up with a real hot-button issue to wrangle with: recreational marijuana and the various moratoriums, mores and morasses associated with the newly legal undertaking in Colorado. Turns out, nobody cares. Despite the fact that both the city of Durango and La Plata County are considering moratoriums on recreational marijuana businesses until the devilish details are ironed out, and that a previously illegal substance is now perfectly legal, these are not issues of pressing concern akin to, say, accessory dwelling units or plastic bags. Or at least no one wants to brand himself, in a public forum, a recreational marijuana user. More likely, the lack of interest in the topic is that marijuana use is a non-issue for most people. If you want to use it, fine. If you don’t, fine. If you can’t wait to purchase it legally from a recreational retailer, too bad. Put simply, there is little debate left. It is interesting, though, how quickly public opinion on the matter has moved. It is reminiscent of the speed with which most of the culture has become comfortable with same-sex marriage to the point that it is a virtual non-issue. Setting aside the much larger concerns about civil rights and discrimination inherent to that topic, gay marriage and marijuana use are similar in that people are increasingly and quickly realizing that neither represents a threat to society at large or to themselves personally. They are, it seems, content to let each to his own.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://www.durangoherald.com/articles/policy-and-politics-digest/rush-to-arms-an-interesting-response-to-states-laws/</link>
        <title>Rush to arms an interesting response to state’s laws</title>
        <description>In Colorado now, those seeking concealed carry permits are required to have some of their training in person, all gun purchases are subject to a background check for the purchaser, and magazine capacity is now limited to 15 rounds. That...</description>
        <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 04:04:27 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">6A68AC98-C5A9-48D0-B583-EDB99D2ED6C5</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Since the Colorado Legislature passed the suite of gun-related measures in its 2013 session, there has been a dramatic uptick in applications for concealed carry permits as well as general stockpiling of weapons and ammunition. What an interesting reaction to bills that require, really, so little of gun owners. In Colorado now, those seeking concealed carry permits are required to have some of their training in person, all gun purchases are subject to a background check for the purchaser, and magazine capacity is now limited to 15 rounds. That these measures would trigger a rush to arms suggests a fear of something far beyond what the new laws dictate — namely that they are the beginning of a long game to eradicate guns statewide or even across the country. That is hardly rational. A more generous reading of the 90 percent increase in concealed carry permit applications is that now citizens seeking the permits feel comforted by the more thorough training they are required to receive in order to carry a concealed weapon. Or that the increase in gun and ammunition purchases is related to an influx of weapon-related collectors in the state. It is a bit frightening to think that fear — of an attack, of government gun seizures, of incompetent or absent policing — is driving this statistical swing in gun activity.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://www.durangoherald.com/articles/policy-and-politics-digest/climate-getting-congressional-nod-with-small-meaningful-measures/</link>
        <title>Climate getting congressional nod with small, meaningful measures</title>
        <description>The Senate panel is also advancing legislation that encourages energy efficiency in industrial buildings. It is hard to argue against such a notion and business owners of all political stripes stand to gain from making investments in efficiency. Doing so...</description>
        <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 05:50:11 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">9EC191CD-9629-4A44-92FB-60CD9388CD95</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[The U.S. Senate is taking baby steps in addressing energy use, and while the measures that are gaining traction there — with tentative support from the House — are not earth-shaking in their scope, they are instructive in their focus. The unifying theme of the measures is primarily efficiency, whether in how energy is produced or how it is consumed. A measure that originated with Rep. Scott Tipton, R-Cortez, and passed with broad bipartisan support in the House, would facilitate small hydropower projects in places where water already flows but is not put to use for energy purposes. The Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee approved the Small Conduit Hydropower Development and Rural Jobs Act last week, and the name notwithstanding (I mean, why not add “moms and apple pie” after “rural jobs”?), it is endemic of the sorts of bills that are palatable to a divided Congress: those that cross ideological lines and make economic and environmental sense for all involved. It is not world-changing, but it is incremental progress — and that says something in the current political climate. The Senate panel is also advancing legislation that encourages energy efficiency in industrial buildings. It is hard to argue against such a notion and business owners of all political stripes stand to gain from making investments in efficiency. Doing so pays big in retained resources, and saves energy in the offing. What’s not to like? These are far from the sweeping changes that are probably needed to adequately and immediately address the growing climate problem — marked last week when carbon dioxide in the atmosphere for the first time reached 400 parts per million, a figure thought to signal a dramatic increase in warming — but they are nonetheless meaningful and, perhaps, are the only way to build momentum toward larger changes.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://www.durangoherald.com/articles/policy-and-politics-digest/waning-session-weariness-wont-eclipse-need-for-action/</link>
        <title>Waning-session weariness won’t eclipse need for action</title>
        <description>The regulatory framework governing recreational marijuana in Colorado is at the top of the docket, and lawmakers have to get this done as per the language of Amendment 64, which legalized marijuana. This is a complex undertaking, with little to...</description>
        <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 05:56:58 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">A58F2F70-A324-4235-B6D5-5320DDC84F3C</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[The Colorado Legislature is about to wrap up its business for the year, and lawmakers are rightly worn out from a busy and contentious session. The political constellations aligned following November&#x92;s election to queue up a series of measures that divided a body already split. Gun control legislation was the primary problem child for this year&#x92;s session, but civil unions, in-state college tuition for undocumented Colorado high school students, sex education standards and measures to reform the K-12 funding structure and the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission all turned partisan heads through the session that began in January. Despite that, the Legislature has a lengthy list of accomplishments for the session and will not stop checking items off the list before Wedensday. The regulatory framework governing recreational marijuana in Colorado is at the top of the docket, and lawmakers have to get this done as per the language of Amendment 64, which legalized marijuana. This is a complex undertaking, with little to no guiding lights to follow. The task force charged with the effort has done significant work in a short time and the Legislature is poised to take ground-breaking action on this issue. Say what you will about marijuana use, but from a policy perspective, it is unusual to watch rules being drawn on such a blank canvas. This legislative session will be landmark for that alone. Lawmakers have earned their exhaustion and deserve high fives for their sprint through a busy session. Regardless of observers&#x92; political affiliation, there has been admirable work done on all sides in Denver this winter and spring &#x97; the results of which will not soon fade.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>
