{"id":43070,"date":"2021-12-24T17:33:51","date_gmt":"2021-12-25T00:33:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.durangoherald.com\/tj\/u-s-population-growth-at-lowest-rate-in-pandemics-first-year\/"},"modified":"2026-03-31T03:11:26","modified_gmt":"2026-03-31T09:11:26","slug":"u-s-population-growth-at-lowest-rate-in-pandemics-first-year","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.durangoherald.com\/tj\/u-s-population-growth-at-lowest-rate-in-pandemics-first-year\/","title":{"rendered":"U.S. population growth at lowest rate in pandemic\u2019s first year"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Light
Light afternoon traffic flows in downtown Dallas, Aug. 12. U.S. population growth dipped to its lowest rate since the nation\u2019s founding during the first year of the pandemic as the coronavirus curtailed immigration, delayed pregnancies and killed hundreds of thousands of U.S. residents. (AP Photo\/LM Otero, file)<\/span>LM Otero<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/p>\n

U.S. population growth dipped to its lowest rate since the nation\u2019s founding during the first year of the pandemic as the coronavirus curtailed immigration, delayed pregnancies and killed hundreds of thousands of U.S. residents, according to figures released Tuesday.<\/p>\n

The United States grew by only 0.1%, with an additional 392,665 added to the U.S. population from July 2020 to July 2021, bringing the nation\u2019s count to 331.8 million people, according to population estimates released by the U.S. Census Bureau.<\/p>\n

The U.S. has been experiencing slow population growth for years but the pandemic exacerbated that trend. This past year was the first time since 1937 that the nation\u2019s population grew by less than 1 million people.<\/p>\n

\u201cI was expecting low growth but nothing this low,\u201d said William Frey, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution\u2019s metropolitan policy program, Brookings Metro. \u201cIt tells us that this pandemic has had a huge impact on us in all kinds of ways, and now demography.\u201d<\/p>\n

Once there\u2019s a handle on the pandemic, the U.S. may eventually see a decrease in deaths, but population growth likely won\u2019t bounce back to what it has been in years past because of fewer births. That will increase the need for immigration by younger workers whose taxes can support programs such as Social Security, Frey said.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe have an aging population and that means fewer women in child-bearing ages,\u201d Frey said. \u201cWe see younger people putting off having children and they\u2019re going to have fewer children.\u201d<\/p>\n

The decision not to have children by young families may be driven by financial worries as much, if not more, than health concerns, said Linda Kahn, a professor at New York University and lead researcher in a study that showed that almost half of New York City mothers who had been trying to become pregnant before the pandemic began in the U.S. in March 2020 stopped in the first few months of the outbreak.<\/p>\n

\u201cCOVID really was a stress test of our whole system and how it fails to support women and families,\u201d Kahn said. \u201cWomen were much harder hit in the pandemic. They lost their jobs at greater rates and had to give up their jobs, often to do home-schooling. The pressures on women were enormous and there\u2019s really no safety net in the U.S.\u201d<\/p>\n

The population estimates are derived from calculating the number of births, deaths and migration in the U.S. For the first time, international migration surpassed natural increases that come from births outnumbering deaths. There was a net increase of nearly 245,000 residents from international migration but only about 148,000 from new births outnumbering deaths.<\/p>\n

International migration dropped by about half from the previous year because of COVID-19 restrictions, such as borders being closed for nonessential travel and the closure of many consulates abroad where visas are issued. As recently as 2016, the U.S. had a net increase of more than 1 million international migrants.<\/p>\n

In more than two dozen states, most notably Florida, deaths outnumbered births. Deaths exceeded births in Florida by more than 45,000 people, but the state\u2019s saving grace was a migration gain of more than 259,000 people, the nation\u2019s highest.<\/p>\n

University of New Hampshire demographer Kenneth Johnson described the decline in the United States\u2019 natural population increase as \u201cstunning,\u201d saying it was the smallest spread of births over deaths in more than 80 years.<\/p>\n

\u201cOf course most of this is COVID, but not all of it,\u201d Johnson said. \u201cU.S. natural increase was already at a low ebb prior to COVID with the fertility rate hitting a new record low each year and deaths steadily rising due to the population aging.\u201d<\/p>\n

Between 2020 and 2021, 33 states saw population increases, primarily through domestic migration, while 17 states and the District of Columbia lost population.<\/p>\n

States in the Mountain West saw the biggest year-over-year growth rate, with Idaho growing by almost 3%, and Utah and Montana each seeing population increases of 1.7%. The District of Columbia lost 2.9% of its population, while New York and Illinois lost 1.6% and 0.9% of their populations, respectively. In pure numbers, California had the greatest net population loss of any state from people leaving: almost 353,000.<\/p>\n

While the pandemic gave some people the option of working remotely, data released last month by the Census Bureau shows there was no great migration in the U.S. because of it.<\/p>\n

Some did take advantage of the opportunity, however. Tired of the heat, hurricane threats and traffic in Houston, tech worker Heidi Krueger moved to a small town south of Knoxville, Tennessee, in September. She can see the Great Smoky Mountains from her front porch.<\/p>\n

\u201cBecause I was working from home during the pandemic, it made it feasible to move and still keep my same job,\u201d Krueger said. \u201cAs long as I have internet, I can still connect to our clients.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Half of New York mothers stopped trying to become pregnant after the outbreak<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":43071,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[28],"naviga_topic":[],"class_list":["post-43070","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","tag-headlines"],"acf":[],"author_name":"Website Administrator","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43070","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=43070"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43070\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":85559,"href":"https:\/\/www.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43070\/revisions\/85559"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/43071"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=43070"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=43070"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=43070"},{"taxonomy":"naviga_topic","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/naviga_topic?post=43070"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}