The
Somehow the Herald thinks being involved with NASA as an engineer is more relevant than the 25 years utility experience that McWilliams possesses?
The next quote: “We favor Rachel Landis, the former director of Fort Lewis College’s environmental center and now the co-founder of an outdoor confidence-building program for girls.” Also from the Herald: “Challenger Dave Nulton has a much stronger background in engineering, however. He has degrees in mechanical and nuclear engineering and has had numerous leadership positions in project management and has prepared environmental studies.”
So a NASA engineer (Unger) is recommended, but a mechanical/nuclear engineer with a project management and environmental background isn’t?
The final quote: “(John) Lee deserves credit for his first responder leadership, but we like (Doug) Fults for his background in engineering.“ So which is it, Herald, engineers yay or nay? I guess it depends on how progressive an engineer.
Vote McWilliams, Lee and Nulton if you want responsible leadership on the board.
Diana SnodgrassDurango
