NEW YORK – The last time the world warmed, 120,000 years ago, the Cancun coastline was swamped by a 7-foot rise in sea level in a few decades. A week from now at that Mexican resort, frustrated negotiators will try again to head off a new global deluge.
The disappointment of Copenhagen – the failure of the annual U.N. conference to produce a climate agreement last year in the Danish capital – has raised doubts about whether the long-running, 194-nation talks can agree on a legally binding treaty for reining in global warming.
“It’s clear after Copenhagen that the U.N. process is ‘on probation,’” said Alden Meyer of the Washington-based Union of Concerned Scientists, a veteran observer and supporter of the process.
Even the Mexican hosts of the Nov. 29-Dec. 10 U.N. conference question whether “it is the best way to work – with 194 countries,” as Mexico’s environment secretary, Juan Rafael Elvira Quesada, put it.
“We must be really open and sincere. Do we need to make an evolution to a new methodology?” Elvira asked.
The core failure has been in finding a consensus formula for mandatory reductions in countries’ emissions of carbon dioxide and other global-warming gases, byproducts of power plants, other industries, agriculture and automobiles.
For 13 years, the United States has refused to join the rest of the industrialized world in the Kyoto Protocol, a binding pact to curb fossil-fuel emissions by modest amounts. More recently, as China, India and other emerging economies exempted from the 1997 Kyoto pact have sharply increased emissions, they have rejected calls by the U.S. and others to commit by treaty to restraints.
No one expects Cancun to resolve that standoff. Instead, delegates will focus on climate financial aid, deforestation and other secondary “building blocks” to try to revive momentum toward an umbrella deal at next year’s conference in South Africa or at the Rio de Janeiro Earth Summit in 2012.
“We expect a positive attitude and a restoration of confidence in the multilateral system at Cancun,” said Grenada’s U.N. ambassador, Dessima Williams, chairman of an alliance of island nations already facing early impacts of climate change.
While the global talks plod along, those impacts seem to be accelerating.
The world’s warming oceans, for example, are rising at twice the 20th century’s average rate, expanding from the heat and the runoff of melting land ice, says the Geneva-based World Climate Research Program. More ice is melting in Greenland and Antarctica than earlier thought, worried scientists report. Authoritative projections of 2007 – that seas might rise by up to 1.94 feet by 2100 – now appear too conservative.
The Yucatan peninsula, where the upcoming talks will take place, once experienced how quickly warming can remake coastlines. Researchers studying fossilized reefs near Cancun report that waters rose at least 6.6 feet in as little as 50 years during the last “interglacial,” or natural warming period between cold, or glacial, ages.
Temperatures then, 120 millennia ago, were only 1.8 degrees warmer than today, about 12,000 years into the current interglacial. In their 2007 assessment, the U.N. network of climate scientists projected temperatures will rise this century by up to 11.5 degrees, depending on whether and how much emissions are rolled back.
The U.N. network – the Nobel Prize-winning Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change – recommended emissions be cut by 25 to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2020 to keep temperatures from rising more than 3.6 degrees C above preindustrial levels. They already rose 1.3 degrees in the 20th century.
In a nonbinding “Copenhagen Accord” from the 2009 conference, industrialized nations pledged reductions of only 18 percent overall, analysts say. The U.S. pledged a 3 percent reduction. China and other developing nations said they would work to rein in emissions growth.
Only a binding treaty with deep reductions can ensure the world will avoid the worst environmental upheavals of climate change, scientists and conservationists say. But the takeover of the U.S. House of Representatives by Republicans, many of whom dismiss strong scientific evidence of human-caused warming, all but rules out U.S. action for at least two years.