Companies with the highest percentage of female directors have been shown to outperform on equity, return on sales and return on invested capital. They pay less to gobble up other firms. They have lower stock price volatility. And those with more women at the top have even been shown to have fewer governance controversies, such as bribery and fraud. There’s enough evidence – even if some is mixed – that some investment firms have launched products geared toward generating higher returns by investing in female-led companies.
Yet according to a new report, men in the boardroom don’t yet seem to buy the idea. A survey by PwC of more than 800 corporate directors found that just 24 percent of the male respondents believed board diversity improves corporate performance, while an overwhelming 89 percent of female directors believe it does. Meanwhile, just 38 percent of the men said it improves board effectiveness, while 92 percent of women agreed that it does.
That sharp divide reflects a surprisingly high percentage of male directors apparently reticent to embrace diversity’s benefits. “Those numbers are telling us that we still have work to do,” said Paula Loop, who leads PwC’s Governance Insights Center. “Female directors in the boardroom still need to convince their male counterparts that they are improving (performance). I think the verdict is still out for men.”
One way to interpret the findings, says Loop, is that male board members are saying “we hear you and we hear investors and shareholders telling us we’re looking for a diverse board and we’re acting on that. But we’re not entirely convinced about why we’re doing that.”
The survey also asked respondents to name the ideal gender breakdown among board members. Currently, women make up just under 20 percent of all seats, a number that has barely budged over the years.
