DENVER – When Rep. Don Coram was a kid, telephones were attached to the wall, and several families shared the same number.
“I grew up on an eight-party landline, and we had a lady named Pearl who thought she had seven of those lines,” said Coram, R-Montrose.
Cellphones? Hadn’t been invented. Internet? Forget about it.
Colorado’s telecommunications laws aren’t quite as old as party lines, but they haven’t been updated for the wireless age. Legislators have been trying for the last four years without success.
Coram and several others think they can do it this year and in the process bring broadband Internet service to unserved rural areas.
There’s more at stake than the ability to stream Netflix on an iPad. Coram said his hometown missed out on 250 jobs from a corporate expansion because Internet connections weren’t fast enough.
The main idea is to deregulate phone service and fund rural Internet lines with some of the fees that customers pay on their phone bills.
Unlike past years, most telecommunications companies appear to be supporting this year’s effort, and that agreement bodes well for Coram and his fellow sponsors. A package of five bills passed their first votes in the House business committee on Tuesday afternoon on unanimous or near-unanimous margins.
But opponents warn that deregulating phone service will lead to higher prices and worse service.
“We need to keep regulation in place, so somebody has a hammer to make these telecom companies do what they need to do for consumers,” said Patricia Yeager, chief executive of the Independence Center, a Colorado Springs group for disability rights.
The Colorado Public Utilities Commission currently regulates basic phone services, sets a cap on monthly bills and gives phone companies a subsidy to serve rural customers.
Coram’s bill would convert some of the subsidy for basic phone service into a fund for Internet companies to build broadband networks. Early estimates are the bill would bring $3 million to $5 million a year into a new broadband fund – far less than the state needs. But supporters say it’s a good start.
“We just don’t have enough money ... to wave a magic wand and say everyone has broadband. It’s going to be an incremental process,” said Pete Kirchof, president of the Colorado Telecommunications Association.
No one publicly opposed Coram’s bill, although Four Corners governments think it would be better if the bill would let local governments apply for broadband grants, said Miriam Gillow-Wiles, executive director of the Southwest Colorado Council of Governments.
“I don’t think this bill as currently written is exactly what we need, but overall it is a step in the right direction,” Gillow-Wiles said.
Rural residents across Colorado have been waiting for broadband for years. Silverton has battled with CenturyLink and its predecessor, Qwest, over construction of a broadband line from Durango. Eagle-Net Alliance is promising to build the line to Silverton, but the group has come under fire for using a $100 million grant from the federal government to build lines in the Denver-metro area and leaving large swaths of rural Colorado without service.
Eagle-Net would be eligible to apply for grants under the broadband bill, Senate sponsors said last week.
The full House is not expected to act on the bills until next week at the earliest.
jhanel@durangoherald.com
