Ad
News Education Local News Nation & World New Mexico

1 in 4 renters using half their pay on housing

Although the Great Recession has ended, millions of Americans who are paying more than a third of their annual income on rental housing are still feeling its impact, an analysis of Census data shows. Income hasn’t risen as fast as rents, and construction hasn’t kept up with the growing demand for rental housing.

WASHINGTON – More than 1 in 4 U.S. renters have to use at least half their family income to pay for housing and utilities.

That’s the finding of an analysis of Census data by Enterprise Community Partners, a nonprofit that helps finance affordable housing. The number of such households has jumped 26 percent to 11.25 million since 2007.

Since the end of 2010, rental prices have surged at nearly twice the pace of average hourly wages, according to data from the real estate firm Zillow and the Labor Department.

“It means making really difficult trade-offs,” said Angela Boyd, a vice president at Enterprise Community Partners. “There are daily financial dilemmas about making their rent or buying groceries.”

The crisis reflects one of the shortcomings of the recovery from the Great Recession: Income has failed to match rent increases. At the same time, construction has failed to keep pace with demand from renters. The recession pushed more millennials, former homeowners who faced foreclosure and low-wage workers into rental housing.

A result is that 2.3 million more families face pressures that leave them perilously close to homelessness.

It’s a reality faced by Lisette Duarte, a 37-year-old living in a two-bedroom apartment with her family in northeast Los Angeles.

Duarte’s husband lost his job as an electrician more than three years ago. With both their son and daughter on the autistic spectrum and in need of care, he chose to stay at home while she worked a job requiring a 90-minute commute each way. The lost income forced them out of a three-bedroom house and eventually into a hotel, where vouchers over the course of five months helped them save for a security deposit for an apartment.

About a year ago, the family moved into a two-bedroom apartment in the Highland Park neighborhood where Duarte had grown up. Two-bedrooms in that gentrifying community rent for an average of about $1,600 a month, according to the online service Apartment List. The expense, along with utilities, consumes half of Duarte’s paycheck. The government defines housing costs in excess of 30 percent of income as burdensome.

The family relies on prepaid cellphones. They don’t dine out or go on vacations. Whatever extra income they have often goes for health care.

More than 30 percent of renters in California, Florida, New Jersey and New York state devote at least half their incomes to housing and utilities, according to the analysis. Other than Alaska, South Dakota and Wyoming, at least 20 percent of renters in every state face similarly high costs relative to income.

The analysis was developed for a “Make Room” awareness campaign sponsored by Enterprise Community Partners. As part of the campaign, pop stars such as Carly Rae Jepsen of “Call Me Maybe” fame, who sang for the Duartes, are performing concerts in the homes of financially distressed tenants.

Enterprise Community Partners’ analysis dovetails with findings from other organizations. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development has estimated that 12 million renters and homeowners spend at least 50 percent of their income on housing.

And Harvard University’s Joint Center for Housing Studies found in a 2013 report that roughly 27 percent of renters were devoting half their incomes to rent. Those levels were “unimaginable just a decade ago,” the report said.

Average hourly wages have risen just 2.1 percent in the past 12 months, according to the Labor Department, while rental prices have climbed 3.7 percent, Zillow said.

Many renters lack the income to pay the cost of maintaining and operating these buildings, said Barry Zigas, director of housing policy at the Consumer Federation of America and a trustee at the nonprofit Mercy Housing.

Mercy Housing has a portfolio of 12,000 units for low-income people and senior citizens. It costs an average of roughly $500 a month to manage each unit, Zigas said. A monthly rent of $500 would mean that anyone working full time for a minimum wage would devote more than a third of his or her income to housing.

Either the tenants must fork over a greater share of their pay each year or landlords may let buildings fall into disrepair.

“Low-income renters are getting caught in a total squeeze play, as are the owners of the properties,” Zigas said.

The Great Recession caused waves of foreclosures and layoffs that pushed more Americans into renting. More than 36 percent of people now rent, compared with 31 percent before the recession began in late 2007. The increased demand has yet to be matched by construction and renovations.

In March, the National Low Income Housing Coalition reported a shortage of 7.1 million apartments for low-income renters. The shortages are most pronounced in Nevada, California, Arizona, Oregon, Florida, Colorado and Utah.

Construction firms are building apartment complexes at an annual pace of roughly 321,333 this year, according to the Commerce Department. The rising rental prices suggest that construction hasn’t kept pace with demand, according to economists.

For renters such as Duarte, the plan is that her husband can eventually return to work as their children reach adulthood, easing some of their financial pressures.

“I hope that we never encounter homelessness again,” she said.

Poorest renters finally getting a break

WASHINGTON – The story of the recession was also a story of the rent being too high. But finally, after more than a decade of housing being out of reach for more and more low-income renters, the number of people with severe housing problems started to ease off between 2011 and 2013, according to the federal department of Housing and Urban Development’s analysis of those with severe housing needs.

HUD is counting people with “worst case housing needs,” which means they make less than 50 percent of the area median income, spend more than half their income on rent and don’t have any housing subsidies. The surge in the number of people in that situation happened because of the convergence of several trends: a foreclosure crisis that forced more homeowners into renting, a longer-term increase in the number of people who prefer renting over homeownership, the loss of income caused by high unemployment, and a drop-off in apartment construction in the wake of the real estate crash.

Since 2011, however, a few of those factors have begun to shift. Foreclosures have started to clear, meaning fewer people are being thrown onto the rental market. Incomes on the lower end have recovered, as unemployment has dropped. More people are actually getting help with their rent, in the form of local or federal housing subsidies. And a hot apartment construction market has added enough supply to ease some of the competition.

People were still forming households at a pretty high rate, and continuing to shift from homeownership to renting, but that wasn’t enough to increase the number of renters in real trouble by much.

Of course, HUD cautious that America still has an affordable housing problem – the number of worst case housing needs is still way higher than it was in 2003. The situation is worse in Western states and hasn’t gotten any better overall for elderly renters, whose fixed incomes weren’t boosted by the recovery in employment. But perhaps, just perhaps, we’ve turned a corner.



Reader Comments