As someone with a graduate degree in meteorology who works in climate change modeling, I’m dismayed by those who discount the work of scientists, who should be regarded as authorities in their fields, in favor of cherry-picked data and biased websites that support their agendas.
I see this anti-science attitude from those who argue against the existence of anthropogenic global warming despite its acceptance by the overwhelming number of climate scientists. I also see it in the discussion of fluoride in our water supply.
I am neither a dentist nor a public health scientist, so I’m not personally qualified to analyze the risks and benefits of community water fluoridation. Fortunately, both the American Dental Association and the Centers for Disease Control have published statements based on research and analysis by people who are educated and trained in these fields.
They have found that community fluoridation at the recommended level prevents cavities and saves money, and protects children in low-income families who may not receive routine dental care, without negative consequences to others. I am inclined to believe these experts, rather than unsubstantiated assertions on websites of dubious reputation.
Let’s protect our children’s health by maintaining community water fluoridation as recommended by the majority of dentists and public health scientists.
Vote against Question 1A.
Ilana Stern
Durango
