Mike Sigman argues that applying the term “fascism” to Republicans is problematic (Herald, Jan. 2). However, equating communism and socialism with fascism reflects a misunderstanding of political doctrine.
Most students of political theory understand fascism as an outgrowth of the repressive ideology advanced by Benito Mussolini. Fascism and national socialism (Nazism) arose from right-leaning politics, not the left. To dismiss this history as mere rhetorical pejorative ignores well-established definitions, particularly as elements of that doctrine are now visible in the implementation of policies such as Project 2025.
Debates over abortion, the rule of law or political ideology are not improved by blurring distinctions that history has already clarified. Fascism is not an abstract insult; it is a governing framework that elevates authoritarianism, suppresses dissent and demands loyalty to a single leader over democratic institutions.
World War II veterans clearly understood this distinction. They fought fascism not as a slogan, but as a concrete threat to democratic self-governance – in Europe and in the Pacific alike. In that sense, opposition to fascism is not radical; it is foundational.
We do have a problem with fascism in the United States today. It shows itself when loyalty to a leader outweighs loyalty to law, when criminal behavior is excused in the name of power and when democratic norms are treated as obstacles rather than safeguards.
It is not hyperbole to say our future depends on recognizing these patterns – and standing firmly against them.
David Black
Bayfield
