When given misinformation, lies and deception by one side of an argument (which should be a discussion), should they be given any credibility? No!

This of course would be the Democrats’ fear-mongering “existential threat.” All disciplines of science welcome questioning and discussions of theories. The scientists who develop new theories welcome debate because in the end they feel it will strengthen their ideas. But not Democrat “science” propagated by grant-grabbing professors; spokespeople for “group think tanks”; and their propagandist toadies in the media with their head-nodding, always-wrong “expert” pundit interviewees.

Every model put forth has been wrong, not off by a time period, but wrong. Their “science” cannot be questioned, “it’s settled” even though there are many independent scientists in all related fields to the climate who, with evidence, disagree with their models. Actually, models often have nothing to do with science, data is put in that retrieves the desired outcome, making them so easily corrupted. Interesting, though, that their “science” brings more power to the Democrat party and greatly enhances the wealth of their elitist contributors.

Inefficient (requiring huge swaths of land), environmentally disastrous (killing wildlife), sporadic and costly wind and solar – that’s the answer! At the end of 2019, wind produced 7.3% of the country’s power and solar 1.8%, something you won’t hear from Democrats.

During the last four years, the U.S. has reduced CO² emissions by 7% and overall emissions by 12%. Thanks, President Trump, competitive free market capitalism and natural gas!

Robert GoodrichBayfield