Log In


Reset Password
News Education Local News Nation & World New Mexico

Museums find likely Nazi-looted artworks

The 1921 painting “Odalisque” is one of 139 art pieces identified by Dutch museums as possibly having been illegally seized from individuals by Nazi authorities during World War II. by Henri Matisse. The painting is one of the top draws at Amsterdam’s Stedelijk Museum.

AMSTERDAM – A major investigation into whether art hanging in Dutch museums may have once been Nazi loot has yielded an unexpectedly large result: 139 suspect works, including ones by masters like Matisse, Klee and Kandinsky.

The bombshell announcement Tuesday by the museums raises the question of why it has taken them nearly 70 years to examine their collections in a systematic way after World War II – and suggests that even more looted art may emerge from other countries that haven’t yet done so.

“These objects are either thought or known to have been looted, confiscated or sold under duress,” said Siebe Weide, director of the Netherlands Museums Association. He said returning them is “both a moral obligation and one that we have taken upon ourselves.”

The tainted art involved 69 paintings, including French artist Henri Matisse’s 1921 “Odalisque” painting of a half-nude reclining woman, which hangs at Amsterdam’s Stedelijk Museum, one of the country’s top tourist draws.

All Dutch museums that hold art from before the war participated in the review. They have identified names of 20 definite looting victims and linked them with 61 of the works. The museums said they are in the process of contacting or seeking the heirs, including those of Jewish art dealer Albert Stern, the deceased owner of the Matisse.

The museum purchased the Matisse painting from Lieuwe Bangma, Stern’s Dutch representative, in 1941. But Stern was its owner before the war and the Bangma family is known to have given aid to his granddaughters during the war.

The Dutch investigation was the second in the Netherlands, with the first one in 2006 focusing only on works that were bought and sold during the war.

“We’re not the first with this investigation, but thanks to this investigation we’re not far behind,” said Rudi Ekkart, a professor of art history at the University of Utrecht who headed the investigating commission.

Critics wondered what took so long

“While I applaud the Dutch for doing this, I also have to say: where were you all this time?” said Chris Marinello, a London-based lawyer who assists clients in looted art cases.

He said many countries, including the United States, should be doing more to help recover looted art.

But some countries are less willing than others. Russia rejects the Washington Principles, saying art taken during World War II are its rightful “trophies.” Switzerland endorses the principles in theory, but has not conducted systematic research and turns a blind eye to the possibility of looted art hidden in its bank vaults, Marinello said.

The Dutch Museums Association launched a website Tuesday to publish its findings so far, solicit more information about looted artwork and assist heirs in filing claims. An English translation of the Dutch website is coming in 2014.

Investigator Ekkart acknowledged it’s still possible that more looted artwork will be uncovered in the Netherlands. He said the museum’s research was not exhaustive and new research strategies – such as the website – will lead to new findings. In addition, there are likely pieces still held in individual’s homes that will be eventually detected.

But “you’ll never again have a hundred at once,” Ekkart said.



Reader Comments