In his column about securing national interests (Herald, Aug. 4), Congressman Tipton addressed threats to national security. He also expressed approval of the bipartisan support for one measure to preserve national security.
Recently, Mr. Tipton voted for an amendment to delete a provision from the National Defense Authorization Act. The provision requires a “study” into the 20-year impacts of climate change on the military. The provision was, however, retained with bipartisan support. Why did Mr. Tipton oppose a “study” into the long-term impacts of climate change?
From what I can conclude, he acknowledges “natural” climate change.
This study could clarify understanding of national threats. Secretary of Defense James Mattis said climate change threatens national security and contributes to global instability. Brigadier General Stephen Cheney, USMC (ret.), Hon. Sherri Goodman, former deputy undersecretary of defense for environmental security, and Rear Admiral David Titley PhD, U.S.N. (ret.), among other experts, have expressed concerns about the threats to national security posed by climate change.
In light of these experts’ concerns, it seems a “study” of the threats of a changing climate would be worthwhile. Clearly, the congressman is genuinely concerned about threats to national security. I hope he finds it valuable to learn all he can about one of the biggest of these threats.
I recommend the congressman consider joining the bipartisan Climate Solutions Caucus to expand his insight on the subject.
Andrew Zeiler
Gem Village
