Southwest Power Pool was supposed to provide LPEA with abundant renewable energy. LPEA contracted with Southwest Power Pool on April 1 to access a wide range of electric generation providers. Tri-State, notably, is also a member of SPP. Now we’ve learned that SPP has directed Tri-State to bring a closed coal-fired power plant back online due to “resource adequacy concerns.”
So let’s get this straight.
Our board chose to leave Tri-State in part because of its reliance on coal – despite announced closure dates and an ongoing transition to renewables, battery storage and lower-carbon generation. We were told joining SPP would provide access to abundant renewable energy. Yet now, SPP is requiring coal generation to ensure reliability when renewable resources fall short. Meanwhile, LPEA members had no vote in exiting Tri-State.
The board issued an RFP for 150 mw of new power beginning in 2028, promising project announcements by the end of 2025. So far, only a 3 mw expansion at Sunnyside has been identified, leaving a significant gap. If this continues, LPEA most likely will rely on market purchases as demand and prices rise.
So I ask: Are members informed about our future power supply? Should we feel confident in its reliability and cost? Is the board being transparent and acting in members’ best interests?
We deserve clear answers, detailed plans and financial accountability. As a board candidate in District 4, I would insist on that level of transparency. Please vote in the upcoming LPEA election.
John Purser
Durango
