The divide between governor candidates Phil Weiser and Michael Bennet over Donald Trump-era policies is not about whether to oppose them – both clearly do. The real question is what kind of opposition actually delivers results for Coloradans. On that front, Attorney General Weiser’s approach is the more immediate and effective.
Weiser treats Trump-era policies as legal problems that must be confronted directly. He has filed more than 60 lawsuits challenging federal actions on immigration, environmental protections, health research and funding for children’s food programs. These cases have not been symbolic – they have delayed or blocked harmful policies in real time. That record reflects a clear philosophy: when federal actions cross legal boundaries, the state must act decisively using the courts.
This is measurable, tangible resistance.
By contrast, Sen. Bennet emphasizes long-term political change – legislation, coalition-building and broader national strategy. That approach has value, but it often lacks urgency. While systemic change is important, it does little to stop harmful policies as they are implemented. Lawsuits are not the whole solution, but they are an essential first line of defense.
The difference comes down to time and accountability. Bennet’s approach focuses on future outcomes; Weiser’s delivers results now.
In a moment when federal decisions can immediately impact healthcare, the environment and economic stability, Colorado needs leadership that acts in the present. Phil Weiser has shown that effective opposition means using every available tool to protect the people of this state – and doing so without delay.
Deen Leonard
Durango
