Unless I’m missing something, the Herald has not reported on Sen. Mark Udall’s, D-Colo., attempt to hide the magnitude of health-care insurance cancellations in Colorado. Regardless of the Obama administration’s panicky attempt to patch things with a one-year extension on a lot of those policies, they are still, effectively canceled. Wait until employees of corporations begin losing their coverage and have to go into more expensive, less beneficial medical coverage. Will the Herald not report that also?
Why has the Herald not noted publicly that almost every word of its early promotions of Obamacare have turned out to be wrong or factually inaccurate? Doesn’t the Herald have some obligation to the community it serves?
Why has there been no mention or discussion of Sen. Michael Bennet’s, D-Colo., involvement in asking the IRS to investigate conservative political groups?
The Herald has now reported on the recent Chris Christie scandal more than it has reported on the IRS and Benghazi scandals.
Where has the Herald’s reportage from the Associated Press noted that, so far, all the predictions about global warming have proved inaccurate?
The real question is why it’s necessary to hide news or underreport news that is unfavorable to liberals. Modifying the news so that parts of it are hidden is something Pravda is noted for.
Mike Sigman
Durango
