Ad
Opinion Editorial Cartoons Op-Ed Editorials Letters to the Editor

Letters: New renderings show same ugly bridge

Thanks to city staff for the updated renderings of the 32nd Street bridge. Sorry, but it’s still ugly.

While the river crossing section matches up with other Animas bridges (which I find reasonable), the section over the tracks look like a train carriage on stilts – literally! And cobbled together with multiple cheap freeway-style pylons, it’s abhorrent and looks like a train wreck. Oh, I get it – maybe that was the intention, to integrate with the railroad (sarcasm).

As a commercial architect for over 35 years, I would expect and demand more from my staff. Isn’t there anyone with a creative sense involved in this process?

With ugly out of the way, I still find the thought of spending $4.1 million on this a boondoggle. Where is the traffic count study to inform us on projected use?

I fully expect bike daredevils to fly through the intersection, gracefully timing their route through the cars as they do elsewhere in town.

I’m not a big fan of the flashing yellow crosswalk lights in vogue, as they can be confusing and unsafe, so I agree on improvements – but why not a true red/green stop light? Won’t some pedestrians simply still want to cross the street to get to the other side? (There’s a chicken story in there somewhere.)

If we still feel this just has to be done, there must be a more effective, graceful solution waiting to be found.

If we can’t get it right, just say no.

Jim RothwellDurango